On 2017-03-01 03:06, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-03-01 02:39, nore...@z505.com wrote:
How come:
class operator Initialize(var aFoo: TFoo);
class operator Finalize(var aFoo: TFoo);
in a record are called class operator..
why not "record operator"?
hahaha... You are asking all the
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
> >
> > why not "record operator"?
> >
> > Are these advanced neo-records considered classes?
>
> It's simply that Delphi introduced static methods to records using the same
> syntax as for classes and operators followed along.
>
> We've simply followed t
Am 01.03.2017 10:06 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
>
> On 2017-03-01 02:39, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> > How come:
> >
> >class operator Initialize(var aFoo: TFoo);
> >class operator Finalize(var aFoo: TFoo);
> >
> > in a record are called class operator..
> >
Am 01.03.2017 03:39 schrieb :
>
> How come:
>
> class operator Initialize(var aFoo: TFoo);
> class operator Finalize(var aFoo: TFoo);
>
> in a record are called class operator..
>
> why not "record operator"?
>
> Are these advanced neo-records considered classes?
It's simply that Delphi introd
On 2017-03-01 02:39, nore...@z505.com wrote:
> How come:
>
>class operator Initialize(var aFoo: TFoo);
>class operator Finalize(var aFoo: TFoo);
>
> in a record are called class operator..
>
> why not "record operator"?
hahaha... You are asking all the questions I've been meaning to as
How come:
class operator Initialize(var aFoo: TFoo);
class operator Finalize(var aFoo: TFoo);
in a record are called class operator..
why not "record operator"?
Are these advanced neo-records considered classes?
Again, sorry I'm new to all this new record stuff (neo records ;-))
If they
