Am 24.04.2019 um 15:31 schrieb Ryan Joseph:
On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:30 AM, Ben Grasset wrote:
Seems like it's mixed up in some way with the FPC-style enumerator operator, so the
"class" version is recognized but not actually implemented currently or
something.
The normal way for classes/rec
> On Apr 24, 2019, at 12:30 AM, Ben Grasset wrote:
>
> Seems like it's mixed up in some way with the FPC-style enumerator operator,
> so the "class" version is recognized but not actually implemented currently
> or something.
>
> The normal way for classes/records/objects is to implement a G
Seems like it's mixed up in some way with the FPC-style enumerator
operator, so the "class" version is recognized but not actually implemented
currently or something.
The normal way for classes/records/objects is to implement a GetEnumerator
function, anyways. Here's an expanded-on version of your
Is "class operator enumerator” supposed to work or is this a bug that it
compiles but doesn’t do anything? Seems like it should work.
===
{$mode objfpc}
{$modeswitch advancedrecords}
program test;
type
TArrayEnumerator = class
public type
TArrayValue = integ
