On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010, spir ☣ wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > Below two quotes from the ref manual:
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > I'm rather confused when reading this.
> > [...]
Thank you Thierry and Michael for your "enlighten
On Mon, 10 May 2010, spir ☣ wrote:
Hello,
Below two quotes from the ref manual:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refch6.html#x67-750006
<< In the Delphi approach to Object Oriented Programming, everything revolves
around the concept of ’Classes’. A class can be seen as a pointer to
Dear Dennis,
See my comment below:
spir ☣ wrote:
Hello,
...
Second, theses texts seem to imply that classes only have drawbacks, compared to object types ;-) The reference does not compare the two models further, I guess; so why bother with a heavier system? Why did Delphi creators design suc
Hello,
Below two quotes from the ref manual:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refch6.html#x67-750006
<< In the Delphi approach to Object Oriented Programming, everything revolves
around the concept of ’Classes’. A class can be seen as a pointer to an object,
or a pointer to a record, wi