Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while planning an XML-centric program I found some related units in the
> > fcl sources and many more inside the lazarus source tree.
> >
> > Which set of them wou
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:53:29 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while planning an XML-centric program I found some related units in
> > the fcl sources and many more inside the lazarus source tree.
> >
>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while planning an XML-centric program I found some related units in the
> fcl sources and many more inside the lazarus source tree.
>
> Which set of them would be the best choice?
It depends on what you want. The XML support in FPC is based
Hi,
while planning an XML-centric program I found some related units in the
fcl sources and many more inside the lazarus source tree.
Which set of them would be the best choice?
According to the comments in some files there is (or was) change to
come.
Do these xml parsers validate against a sch
