Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via fpc-pascal
On 13/02/2021 16:52, Ched via fpc-pascal wrote: Hello, For one software I compile with fpc, Avast always complained. But only when compiled for debugging. That exe was sent to the false positive departement, and it toke about _one mounth_ to have a corrected version of the AV. Afterwhat, he n

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-13 Thread Ched via fpc-pascal
Hello, For one software I compile with fpc, Avast always complained. But only when compiled for debugging. That exe was sent to the false positive departement, and it toke about _one mounth_ to have a corrected version of the AV. Afterwhat, he never complained even with reworked source code.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-13 Thread Martin Frb via fpc-pascal
On 13/02/2021 03:55, Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal wrote: that if you have any timing routines in your code, it tends to get flagged by virus scanners.  No clue why, but I've run afoul of that issue more than once. I read somewhere that some viruses have a build in wait, to evade sandbox detec

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-13 Thread Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
Op 2021-02-12 om 22:48 schreef James Richters via fpc-pascal: The problem I have had is when programs I compile generate a false virus detection.. sure on my own computer I can just disable that directory from the virus scanner but it becomes a problem when I release it to my customers and th

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-13 Thread Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal
> I've also noticed that if you have any timing routines in your code, it tends > to get flagged by virus scanners. No clue why, but I've run afoul of that > issue more than once. > Debugger detection? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fre

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal
4:28 PM *To:* FPC-Pascal users discussions *Cc:* Dmitry Boyarintsev *Subject:* Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program Are signed executables subject to anti-virus inspection? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@l

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Martin Frb via fpc-pascal
On 12/02/2021 22:48, James Richters via fpc-pascal wrote: I have no idea how to register a legitimate program as not having a virus. I've had this issue before but managed to track down the section of code that caused it... after a completely exhaustive search. Anti virus providers normal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread James Richters via fpc-pascal
How does one sign an executable? From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of Dmitry Boyarintsev via fpc-pascal Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 4:28 PM To: FPC-Pascal users discussions Cc: Dmitry Boyarintsev Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program Are signed

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread James Richters via fpc-pascal
riday, February 12, 2021 1:16 PM To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Cc: Graeme Geldenhuys Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program On 12/02/2021 4:17 pm, Bart via fpc-pascal wrote: > I exclude the folders where fpc/lazarus reside from scanning. > Also the fo

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Dmitry Boyarintsev via fpc-pascal
Are signed executables subject to anti-virus inspection? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via fpc-pascal
On 12/02/2021 4:17 pm, Bart via fpc-pascal wrote: > I exclude the folders where fpc/lazarus reside from scanning. > Also the folders where I develop my programs. > If you don't you're bound to get strange bugs and thing like this. Yes, that's a very good idea. We do the same at work for our Java,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Bart via fpc-pascal
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 9:10 AM Alexander Bunakov via fpc-pascal wrote: > As of trunk r48648, Windows Defender deletes fp.exe after compilation > because it considers it an infected file. It claims that fp.exe is > infected with Trojan:Win32/Fuerboos.E!cl and quarantines the file. I exclude the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Winfried Bartnick via fpc-pascal
ttps://dcclost.com> *From:* fpc-pascal on behalf of Alexander Bunakov via fpc-pascal *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:22:40 AM *To:* fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org *Cc:* Alexander Bunakov *Subject:* [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender conside

Re: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Alexander Grotewohl via fpc-pascal
ascal Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:22:40 AM To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org Cc: Alexander Bunakov Subject: [fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program Hello all, As of trunk r48648, Windows Defender deletes fp.exe after compilation because it considers it an inf

[fpc-pascal] Windows Defender considers fp.exe a malicious program

2021-02-12 Thread Alexander Bunakov via fpc-pascal
Hello all, As of trunk r48648, Windows Defender deletes fp.exe after compilation because it considers it an infected file. It claims that fp.exe is infected with Trojan:Win32/Fuerboos.E!cl and quarantines the file. Anyone else is experiencing this? Any idea why is this happening? -- Regards,