Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 14:03 schrieb Andreas Berger:
> My problem is that there are cheap motherboards appearing
> that no longer have serial ports. I'm afraid that soon none will.
> Therefore I am looking for alternatives.
I'm running also a DOS Program and now it is ported to Linux.
Andreas Berger wrote:
> > My own feeling if you /have/ to have a DOS environment and don't mean
> > something like the '98 DOS box would be to see if you could run the code
> > under either DosEmu or Qemu, both of which allow guest session ports to
> > be mapped to whatever hardware is supported b
> Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > EPROM blaster, but obviously that sort of thing wouldn't work where the
> > physical
> > device types differed.
> >
> Actually, I use DOS directly. I use cheap off-the-shelf motherboard for
> an embedded system that our company uses. The motherboard talks the the
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've come across a website discussing connection of a USB CD-ROM drive to a DOS
system for booting purposes but I've not seen reference to serial devices. I
think the people to ask about this might be Parallax since they use
USB-connected serial ports for device programmi
Andreas Berger wrote:
> > I have two Prolific 2303 serial converters without problems. There is
> > native USB support in the kernel (2.6.17). I have run them at 38400. I am
> > interested in your problems - maybe I can prevent some future problem.
> >
> >
> Does anyone know about USB-to-Serial fo
> Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > > The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip
> > > inside. http://www.ftdichip.com/
> > > http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
> >
> > Do they have the same latency as a normal
> Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > > The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip
> > > inside. http://www.ftdichip.com/
> > > http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
> >
> > Do they have the same latency as a normal
We tried USB converters with prolific chipset and it hangs up then, so
FTDI chips would be better. I read also somewhere a lack of latency.
May be it is also a question of the Kerneldriver and the driver will
improve more in the future.
I have two Prolific 2303 serial converters without p
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:23:56 +0100
Rainer Stratmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We tried USB converters with prolific chipset and it hangs up then, so
> FTDI chips would be better. I read also somewhere a lack of latency.
> May be it is also a question of the Kerneldriver and the driver will
> im
Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip
> > inside. http://www.ftdichip.com/
> > http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
>
> Do they have the same latency as a normal serial port
> The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip inside.
> http://www.ftdichip.com/
> http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Do they have the same latency as a normal serial port? I've tried several
usb-serial ports, and they all have horrible latencie
The best USB-serial Interfaces for Linux are the ones with FTDI Chip inside.
http://www.ftdichip.com/
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/EvaluationKits/USB-Serial.htm
Rainer
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal
12 matches
Mail list logo
