On 2016-11-16 11:38, luciano de souza wrote:
> Between my message and yours, I found your TestFramework. It worked
> imediately, I liked, so I changed from FPCUnit to TestFramework.
Excellent. It works many times faster than FPCUnit, and has many more
features too. It even has a FPCUnit compatibil
Graeme,
Between my message and yours, I found your TestFramework. It worked
imediately, I liked, so I changed from FPCUnit to TestFramework.
In examples, I used check, checkequals, fail... Excelent! The single
feature I couldn't understand is "CheckException".
I have this code:
procedure TGroupTes
On 2016-11-15 09:06, luciano de souza wrote:
> So I runned the test with the following commandline:
>
> ./testrunner -a --format=plain
>
> However, the output produced was in XML.
I had a quick look at the source code of the demo included with FPCUnit.
Interestingly, it defines its own test runn
Hello all,
I am trying to run testcases.
For testing the idea, I compile the example contained in:
./fpc-3.0.0/packages/fcl-fpcunit
The compilation was successful.
As I am blind, the XML format is very unpleasant becose the output is
too verbose.
So I runned the test with the following commandl
