On 2/7/2014 4:06 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-02-07 waldo kitty mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>>:
[...]
so now i'm a bit confused but it has been a long day... again... :/
This makes sense... at least in your previous version: I guess catnbr is a
string.
yes...
Compare uses wha
2014-02-07 waldo kitty :
> On 2/6/2014 1:47 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
>
>> On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
>>
>>> ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
>>> whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
>>> think about that and how to do
On 2/6/2014 1:47 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
think about that and how to do it in my app... right now i'm only
passing th
On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
think about that and how to do it in my app... right now i'm only
passing the necessary key because the record is 'la
On 2/6/2014 4:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Then my trick does not work for you because it hides the fact that the records
are identical.
actually, the problem comes when referencing the IndexOf() the record...
IndexOf(Item) is passed (unmodified) thru a couple of routines to finally end u
On 2/5/2014 7:48 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/5/2014 5:24 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm unsure what to do or how to handle this so that there is a secondary
(sub) sorting order so that the main key is the master sort and then a
secondary ""key"" is used when duplicates are allowed...
You put both
2014-02-06 waldo kitty :
> On 2/5/2014 3:57 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> [...]
>
> Once again I did not test this, but it seems to me that if Compare
>> returned -1
>> instead of 0, any duplicate would be inserted after because it would
>> never be
>> considered as equal to any other. But sin
On 2/5/2014 5:24 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm unsure what to do or how to handle this so that there is a secondary
(sub) sorting order so that the main key is the master sort and then a
secondary ""key"" is used when duplicates are allowed...
You put both key comparisons in the same .Compare func
On 2/5/2014 3:57 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
[...]
Once again I did not test this, but it seems to me that if Compare returned -1
instead of 0, any duplicate would be inserted after because it would never be
considered as equal to any other. But since you still want your collection to be
able
2014-02-05 waldo kitty :
> On 2/4/2014 5:16 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> 2014-02-04 waldo kitty > wkitt...@windstream.net>>:
>>
> [...]
>
> i kinda thought about that earlier when i was digging thru the
>> code... IIRC,
>> insert was overridden because there are cases where the exi
On 2/4/2014 5:16 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-02-04 waldo kitty mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net>>:
[...]
i kinda thought about that earlier when i was digging thru the code... IIRC,
insert was overridden because there are cases where the existing record
needs to be replaced (b
2014-02-04 waldo kitty :
> On 2/4/2014 3:28 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
>
>> On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
>>> inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
>>> are in reverse order from how t
On 2/4/2014 3:28 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
are in reverse order from how they were inserted...
Sounds like your TSortedC
On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
are in reverse order from how they were inserted...
Sounds like your TSortedCollection.Compare() needs additional logi
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be inserted in...
the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys are in reverse order from
how they were inserted...
i am overriding MyCollection^.Insert because i have additional tasks that need
to be done at the time of
15 matches
Mail list logo
