Re: [fpc-pascal] Suggestion about ability to pass local procedures as variables

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Snijders < vincent.snijd...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/11/30 Max Vlasov : > > So, I suppose that implementing closures is not in real plans (it's ok, I > > can live with that), but what about the second, is it possible? > > > > I will glad to hear different

Re: [fpc-pascal] Suggestion about ability to pass local procedures as variables

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Snijders < vincent.snijd...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/11/30 Max Vlasov : > > Hi, > > > > it appears recently several pieces if knowledge came to me, I understood > how > > anonymous functions (aka closures) work :) and the fact that GNU Pascal > > allows pa

Re: [fpc-pascal] Suggestion about ability to pass local procedures as variables

2010/11/30 Max Vlasov : > Hi, > > it appears recently several pieces if knowledge came to me, I understood how > anonymous functions (aka closures) work :) and the fact that GNU Pascal > allows passing local procedure as variables. I mentioned them together > because as many I don't like the closur

[fpc-pascal] Suggestion about ability to pass local procedures as variables

Hi, it appears recently several pieces if knowledge came to me, I understood how anonymous functions (aka closures) work :) and the fact that GNU Pascal allows passing local procedure as variables. I mentioned them together because as many I don't like the closures as they implemented everywhere i