2013/1/11 Juha Manninen
>
> I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still
> need improvement but nobody is actively working on it.
> I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state?
> Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long ToDo list).
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Juha Manninen wrote:
> For example, if someone is developing a competing generics library,
> could he be advised to improve fcl-stl instead? Would patches be accepted?
>
Hi there.
I have been working on a few generic types here:
https://github.com/tangentsto
Am 11.01.2013 11:19, schrieb Juha Manninen:
>
> For example, if someone is developing a competing generics library,
> could he be advised to improve fcl-stl instead?
Definitively.
> Would patches be accepted?
Yes.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Juha Manninen wrote:
I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still
need improvement but nobody is actively working on it.
I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state?
Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long
Am 11.01.2013 11:19, schrieb Juha Manninen:
I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still
need improvement but nobody is actively working on it.
I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state?
Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long T
I remember seeing discussion about fcl-stl saying that it would still
need improvement but nobody is actively working on it.
I just couldn't find the thread about it now. So, what is the current state?
Sorry I have not studied the lib myself yet (long ToDo list).
For example, if someone is develop
