Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Neil Graham
To add my two cents to this debate. I have always thought the ideal form of standards (or de facto thereof) came from benevolent dictators. Borland did that job well for quite a long time, a single vision developed well beats the design-by-committee half-compromise path any day. The problem

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
> I found your answers to my naive questions really interesting. And > certainly I agree. Would it be possible to make them more visible on the > web site of Free Pascal? In practice, include the texts you pointed to > (iso-ansi discussion and delphilater) in the web site? Or did I missed > them?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Gilles MARCOU
Hi Marco, I found your answers to my naive questions really interesting. And certainly I agree. Would it be possible to make them more visible on the web site of Free Pascal? In practice, include the texts you pointed to (iso-ansi discussion and delphilater) in the web site? Or did I missed them?

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
> the question is interesting in my opinion. The standard for a language > (C, Fortran, C++) > or an authority able to define the language (Java) Sun has owned Java for much of the time, as well as CG did Delphi. I wouldn't place them in the same part as the former. > helps to write code that w

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Adriaan van Os
leledumbo wrote: Why Modern Pascal isn't standardized? Take a look at its other brothers and sisters, for example C & Fortran. (AFAIK) C has been standardized in 1989 and 1999 (there perhaps earlier ones), while Fortran in 60,77,..(I forgot these ones, there are too many),2000,2003(,2005?). Pasca

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Gilles MARCOU
> > -------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:45:01 +0300 > From: ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal > To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions&qu

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread ik
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, leledumbo wrote: > >> >> Why Modern Pascal isn't standardized? Take a look at its other brothers and >> sisters, for example C & Fortran. (AFAIK) C has been standardized in 1989 >> and 1999 (th

Re: [fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, leledumbo wrote: > > Why Modern Pascal isn't standardized? Take a look at its other brothers and > sisters, for example C & Fortran. (AFAIK) C has been standardized in 1989 > and 1999 (there perhaps earlier ones), while Fortran in 60,77,..(I forgot > these ones, there are to

[fpc-pascal] Standardization of Modern Pascal

2008-07-07 Thread leledumbo
Why Modern Pascal isn't standardized? Take a look at its other brothers and sisters, for example C & Fortran. (AFAIK) C has been standardized in 1989 and 1999 (there perhaps earlier ones), while Fortran in 60,77,..(I forgot these ones, there are too many),2000,2003(,2005?). Pascal has only 2 stand