On 11.03.2021 1:43, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Yuriy Sydorov via fpc-pascal wrote:
Neither parameter may be necessary on Windows, but that's probably the
only one.
Android and MS-DOS targets also ignore -CX -XX
* when using the internal linker... :) Extern
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Yuriy Sydorov via fpc-pascal wrote:
> > Neither parameter may be necessary on Windows, but that's probably the
> > only one.
>
> Android and MS-DOS targets also ignore -CX -XX
* when using the internal linker... :) External linkers may be supported
for these targets, jus
On 10.03.2021 14:29, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 10/03/2021 13:17, Yuriy Sydorov via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 10.03.2021 11:34, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
A.) I compile my (units) program/library with -CX -XX (set in Project
Options)
Just a small note:
-CX -XX are not needed for the
On 10/03/2021 14:51, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>> On 10/03/2021 14:33, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
>>> It will be nice have this in documentation. For example in
>>> https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse30.html#x
It will be nice have this in documentation. For example in
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse30.html#x195-207.3
At least explain:
- relation of -CX and -XX
Indeed.
- what is to be removed: non-referenced non-virtual methods, global
variables, and regular procedures/function
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 10/03/2021 14:33, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
It will be nice have this in documentation. For example in
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse30.html#x195-207.3
At least explain:
- relation of -CX and -XX
Indeed.
I
On 10/03/2021 14:33, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
> It will be nice have this in documentation. For example in
> https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse30.html#x195-207.3
>
> At least explain:
> - relation of -CX and -XX
Indeed.
> - what is to be removed: non-referenced non-virtual m
It will be nice have this in documentation. For example in
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progse30.html#x195-207.3
At least explain:
- relation of -CX and -XX
- what is to be removed: non-referenced non-virtual methods, global
variables, and regular procedures/functions
- (may b
On 10/03/2021 13:17, Yuriy Sydorov via fpc-pascal wrote:
> On 10.03.2021 11:34, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
>>
>> A.) I compile my (units) program/library with -CX -XX (set in Project
>> Options)
>>
>
> Just a small note:
>
> -CX -XX are not needed for the top-tier targets nowadays. The section
>
On 10.03.2021 11:34, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
A.) I compile my (units) program/library with -CX -XX (set in Project Options)
Just a small note:
-CX -XX are not needed for the top-tier targets nowadays. The section based smart linking is a default option in recent
FPC versions.
Yuriy.
_
LacaK via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 10.
März 2021, 10:34:
> Hi,
>
> my goal is DO NOT include unused procedures, methods in final
> program/library on Win32 target exe/dll.
>
> A.) I compile my (units) program/library with -CX -XX (set in Project
> Options)
>
> B.) I did also experiments with WP
On 10/03/2021 10:34, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
> 1. I did not notice difference between A and B (it seems like WPO did
> not reduce size of EXE (may be that I do something wrong))
> 1.1 is there way how I can check which procedures were striped out or
> vice-versa included?
You can generate link
Hi,
my goal is DO NOT include unused procedures, methods in final
program/library on Win32 target exe/dll.
A.) I compile my (units) program/library with -CX -XX (set in Project
Options)
B.) I did also experiments with WPO: -OWall -FWprogram.wpo -Xs- (plus
-Owall -Fwprogram.wpo)
Questions
13 matches
Mail list logo
