Den 10-01-2011 16:10, Jonas Maebe skrev:
On 10 Jan 2011, at 06:54, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
Doesn't the problem lie in that TFPGObjectList uses @ on the incoming
parameters?
function TFPGObjectList.Add(const Item: T): Integer;
begin
Result := inherited Add(@Item);
end;
Unless there's some mag
On 10 Jan 2011, at 06:54, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
Doesn't the problem lie in that TFPGObjectList uses @ on the
incoming parameters?
function TFPGObjectList.Add(const Item: T): Integer;
begin
Result := inherited Add(@Item);
end;
Unless there's some magic going on, won't it then point to the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Jeppe Johansen wrote:
Den 10-01-2011 02:36, leledumbo skrev:
Compile the attached project (really difficult to trim it down) using two
different options. First, using -glh, then using -g. The first one raises
nothing (program runs fine), while the second raises segmentati
Den 10-01-2011 02:36, leledumbo skrev:
Compile the attached project (really difficult to trim it down) using two
different options. First, using -glh, then using -g. The first one raises
nothing (program runs fine), while the second raises segmentation fault.
When debugged deeper using gdb, the s
Compile the attached project (really difficult to trim it down) using two
different options. First, using -glh, then using -g. The first one raises
nothing (program runs fine), while the second raises segmentation fault.
When debugged deeper using gdb, the second gives this backtrace:
Program rec
