> > Here is my first fpc DOS attack:
> >
> > type
> > TMyClassA = class;
> >
> > TMyClassA = class(TMyClassA)
> > procedure DoSomething; override;
> > end;
Email Abuse Syndrome:
This makes me think we should start up something accepting emails as input to
the
compiler interface.
Ever
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:08:26 +0100
Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:50:28 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, L505 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Also, a simple macro could end u
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:50:28 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, L505 wrote:
Also, a simple macro could end up in a neverending loop and bring down
the server. Lots of other ways to make a compiler go nuts.
The Free Pascal
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:03:58AM -0500, Tony Pelton wrote:
> On 12/5/05, Tom Verhoeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do this? Because that way people can use/try FreePascal without
> > installing anything.
>
> installing really isn't too complicated currently.
>
> download a tarball, expan
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Tom Verhoeff wrote:
[...]
I was thinking of adding a remote FreePascal service along the following
lines. You go to its web interface, browse for your source files
(possibly a whole zip archive) on your local machine, enter command-line
options
Tom Verhoeff wrote:
[...]
I was thinking of adding a remote FreePascal service along the following
lines. You go to its web interface, browse for your source files
(possibly a whole zip archive) on your local machine, enter command-line
options, and let our server compile your stuff with a (sel
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:50:28 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, L505 wrote:
>
> > Also, a simple macro could end up in a neverending loop and bring down
> > the server. Lots of other ways to make a compiler go nuts.
>
> The Free Pascal compiler
Tom Verhoeff wrote:
I was thinking of adding a remote FreePascal service along the following
lines. You go to its web interface, browse for your source files
(possibly a whole zip archive) on your local machine, enter command-line
options, and let our server compile your stuff with a (selectable
One thing I would like to add to the discussion is support for the LCL.
Dunno if it was explicitly the puurpose to do that already, but I thought
I should mention it anyway.
Darius
> We (still) use FreePascal quite a bit in our first/second-year education,
> in particular, in , our Programming Ed
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 5 dec 2005, at 16:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > I would also add the possibility to upload a zip file with some units.
> > Processing a single unit is not useful for evaluation, and having to
> > upload all units manually is tedious and erro
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, L505 wrote:
>
>
> > > Don't make all distributed units available, and forbid the use of some
> > > units. You don't want people opening an FTP socket and download 24G on
> > > your machine.
> > >
> > > Even then, people could create a unit that makes direct kernel
> > > c
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, L505 wrote:
> Also, a simple macro could end up in a neverending loop and bring down the
> server.
> Lots of other ways to make a compiler go nuts.
The Free Pascal compiler checks for recursive expansion. If it goes over 16, it
stops.
In case you prove otherwise, of cours
> > Don't make all distributed units available, and forbid the use of some
> > units. You don't want people opening an FTP socket and download 24G on
> > your machine.
> >
> > Even then, people could create a unit that makes direct kernel
> > calls, or
> > link to C. I would disallow use of the
Also, a simple macro could end up in a neverending loop and bring down the
server.
Lots of other ways to make a compiler go nuts.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I made a browser based freepascal compiler to demonstrate something I call
"Browser
Abuse Syndrome". Along with a Tail utility Paul was interested in seeing, it is
doable. The bandwidth, though, is expensive.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@list
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:54:25PM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> I would also add the possibility to upload a zip file with some units.
> Processing a single unit is not useful for evaluation, and having to
> upload all units manually is tedious and error-prone.
That is the intention (as
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:55:29PM +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> >Don't make all distributed units available, and forbid the use of some
> >units. You don't want people opening an FTP socket and download 24G on
> >your machine.
>
> I think it only compiles things,
On 12/5/05, Tom Verhoeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do this? Because that way people can use/try FreePascal without
> installing anything.
ah ...
installing really isn't too complicated currently.
download a tarball, expand it, and run the compiler ?
i can't imagine having to fiddle arou
On 5 dec 2005, at 16:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I would also add the possibility to upload a zip file with some units.
Processing a single unit is not useful for evaluation, and having to
upload all units manually is tedious and error-prone.
From the original mail:
***
I was thinking of
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 12/5/05, Tom Verhoeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Do you think this service would be useful?
Extremely useful! And a great idea. Things like that can be revolutionary.
2. Do you think the interface described above is good e
> Furthermore, we plan to support several versions of FreePascal in
> parallel. That way, it may also be useful to the FreePascal community.
> E.g. when diagnosing a problem.
>
> Here are some questions:
>
> 1. Do you think this service would be useful?
Yes. Also for us, since this allows us
On 12/5/05, Tom Verhoeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Do you think this service would be useful?
Extremely useful! And a great idea. Things like that can be revolutionary.
> 2. Do you think the interface described above is good enough?
> Suggestions for refinements would be appreci
On 5 dec 2005, at 13:59, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Don't make all distributed units available, and forbid the use of some
units. You don't want people opening an FTP socket and download 24G on
your machine.
Even then, people could create a unit that makes direct kernel
calls, or
link to C.
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Don't make all distributed units available, and forbid the use of some
units. You don't want people opening an FTP socket and download 24G on
your machine.
I think it only compiles things, and does not execute them.
Micha
___
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Tom Verhoeff wrote:
We (still) use FreePascal quite a bit in our first/second-year education,
in particular, in , our Programming Education And
Contest Hosting verification system.
I was thinking of adding a remote FreePascal service along the following
lines. You go to i
We (still) use FreePascal quite a bit in our first/second-year education,
in particular, in , our Programming Education And
Contest Hosting verification system.
I was thinking of adding a remote FreePascal service along the following
lines. You go to its web interface, browse for your source file
26 matches
Mail list logo
