Excellent explanation.
Thanks Martin.
Regards,
Nino
//***
On Monday 08 June 2009 20:33:48 Martin Friebe wrote:
> fpcl...@silvermono.co.za
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/
fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Can you please refrain from quoting the *whole* previous message...
Okay. Point taken.
Thank you, Nino!
Everyone, please trim your quotes!
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 22:19:47 Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 07 Jun 2009, at 10:35, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to
include
functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing
here, pl
On Monday 08 June 2009 19:55:00 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Can you please refrain from quoting the *whole* previous message, when your
> reply only relates to one or two lines. If other developers want to read
> the whole context of the message thread they can look in their email
> hi
Hi Nino,
Can you please refrain from quoting the *whole* previous message, when your
reply only relates to one or two lines. If other developers want to read the
whole context of the message thread they can look in their email history or the
mailing list archive.
It is REALLY annoying seeing
On Sunday 07 June 2009 22:19:47 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 07 Jun 2009, at 10:35, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
> > A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to
> > include
> > functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing
> > here, please
> > bare with me.
>
>
On 07 Jun 2009, at 10:35, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to
include
functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing
here, please
bare with me.
The difference you skip over is the fundamental reason why one wor
Hi Jonas
Thanks for the reply.
A high level, a class is like a record that has been modified to include
functions and procedures. I know that I'm over simplifying thing here, please
bare with me.
I'm trying to understand the logic employed by the creators of Delphi where
they don't allow to w
On 06 Jun 2009, at 17:36, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote:
Is there a reason why the following code fails to compile in Delphi
but
compile in FPC? Could the reason be that FPC allows the use of global
properties?
No, it's an error in FPC which has been fixed in 2.3.1:
http://wiki.freepascal
Hi Guys,
Is there a reason why the following code fails to compile in Delphi but
compile in FPC? Could the reason be that FPC allows the use of global
properties? Tested with Delphi 5 and up.
The Delphi compiler complains about the lines:
TestClass.TestRec.X := 10;
TestClass.TestRec.Y := 20; wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
