Those macros are simply to reduce typing, better use true debugger. Even if
RTTI can (which I believe not), it would be an abuse of the feature.
Macros in FPC aren't as flexible as in C for a purpose IMHO: it's often
abused as the way you show.
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pasc
On 1 okt '12, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> I need to
translate this: #define mymalloc(x,y) (x*)malloc((y)* sizeof(x))
>
>
Is it possible using macro's in FPC or do I need to convert it to a
procedure? How would I cast the pointer in the latter case (without
having to change the sourcec
If you want to port the code to clean Pascal, I suggest using related
language feature, e.g. dynamic array. You can't really port that macro (even
to a procedure / function), as the first parameter expected is a type name.
If malloc returns Pointer, it doesn't need to be casted, the value is
compat
On 01/10/2012 15:21, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> I need to translate this:
> #define mymalloc(x,y) (x*)malloc((y)* sizeof(x))
>
> Is it possible using macro's in FPC or do I need to convert it to a
> procedure? How would I cast the pointer in the latter case (without
> having to change the
