> Fixed, plus a couple of others as well. Revision 21942.
> Thanks, it's a great help.
> Michael.
I pulled the latest this morning and ran it over my whole project
(about 140 units, 600,000-ish lines of code) and didn't get any more
segfaults and it seems like all the information I'm pulling out o
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Fixed.
It seems that using the heaptrc unit masks some access violations.
Michael.
Good to know. That fix seemed to work, but there's an issue with
having an "else" in a case statement. If you remove the else it works.
Fixed, plus a couple of others
> Fixed.
> It seems that using the heaptrc unit masks some access violations.
> Michael.
Good to know. That fix seemed to work, but there's an issue with
having an "else" in a case statement. If you remove the else it works.
==
unit timelib;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Hm, it's still failing for me.
Here's what I get with test_parser from examples given this input:
===
unit timelib;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
implementation
procedure SmonthToCmonth (const sMonth
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Hm, it's still failing for me.
Here's what I get with test_parser from examples given this input:
[]
I'm doing it in Linux compiling for x86_64. There wouldn't be any
problem with me using this package source (pastree, paswrite, pparser,
pscanner) w
Hm, it's still failing for me.
Here's what I get with test_parser from examples given this input:
===
unit timelib;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
implementation
procedure SmonthToCmonth (const sMonth : array of char;
c
> Works fine here.
> Michael.
Hm, that's odd. I'll do a clean pull and clean build and let you know. Thanks.
-SG
--
This email is fiction. Any resemblance to actual events
or persons living or dead is purely coincidental.
Seth Grover
___
fpc-pascal ma
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Michael, I pulled down your latest revision (21934) which did fix the
problems I had reported. Thanks!
I did find another one for you:
unit timelib;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
implementation
procedure Smo
Michael, I pulled down your latest revision (21934) which did fix the
problems I had reported. Thanks!
I did find another one for you:
unit timelib;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
implementation
procedure SmonthToCmonth (const sMonth : array of char;
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Also, it looks like it gets a segfault if you try to $include a file
that can't be found.
Fixed in rev. 21932. Uninitialized result.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
I ran into another problem scenario, dealing with $include'd files.
Given these two files:
I get an error like this:
Syntax error at token "EOF" in file iputils.pas at line 21 column
-7202378 line:21 column:-7202378 file:iputils.pas
Fixed. Undefine
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
I should have fixed both problems you found. Please test, rev 21922.
Michael.
It did fix those problems, but there's still a problem in the release
given the following unit with a finalization section:
===
unit
Also, it looks like it gets a segfault if you try to $include a file
that can't be found.
-SG
--
This email is fiction. Any resemblance to actual events
or persons living or dead is purely coincidental.
Seth Grover
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pasca
I ran into another problem scenario, dealing with $include'd files.
Given these two files:
==iputils.pas
unit iputils;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
{$define IPv6_Types}
{$include ip.inc}
{$undef IPv6_Types}
{$define IPv6_Interface}
{$in
> I should have fixed both problems you found. Please test, rev 21922.
> Michael.
It did fix those problems, but there's still a problem in the release
given the following unit with a finalization section:
===
unit testlib;
interface
implementation
final
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
I think I found another problem with the latest revision of fcl-passrc
in svn trunk.
I should have fixed both problems you found. Please test, rev 21922.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
I think I found another problem with the latest revision of fcl-passrc
in svn trunk.
Given this source file as input to the test_parser program:
===
unit timelib;
interface
implementation
procedure SortIndexHashTable;
begin
try
except
if (h <> nil) the
Michael wrote:
> Please check revision 21909.
> I haven't done much testing, because I didn't get to the test cases for
> statements yet.
Michael, I grabbed what's currently up in the svn trunk under fcl-passrc.
I am getting the source filename and line number information now, so
that's great.
I
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Seth Grover wrote:
Oversight, a bug.
I am currently working on the parser, I'll look into this.
Michael.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
Please check revision 21909.
I haven't done much testing, because I didn't get to the test cases for
statements yet.
Michael.
_
> Oversight, a bug.
> I am currently working on the parser, I'll look into this.
> Michael.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
-SG
--
This email is fiction. Any resemblance to actual events
or persons living or dead is purely coincidental.
Seth Grover
___
fpc-p
20 matches
Mail list logo
