On 04 Feb 2009, at 22:36, Ken G. Brown wrote:
At 10:30 PM +0100 2/4/09, Jonas Maebe apparently wrote:
On 04 Feb 2009, at 18:48, Ken G. Brown wrote:
However, when I try running from Finder, I get a short few
characters out the serial port then the program dies. This is
whether or not the '
At 10:30 PM +0100 2/4/09, Jonas Maebe apparently wrote:
>On 04 Feb 2009, at 18:48, Ken G. Brown wrote:
>
>>However, when I try running from Finder, I get a short few characters out the
>>serial port then the program dies. This is whether or not the 'run under
>>Rosetta' box is checked in Get Info
On 04 Feb 2009, at 18:48, Ken G. Brown wrote:
However, when I try running from Finder, I get a short few
characters out the serial port then the program dies. This is
whether or not the 'run under Rosetta' box is checked in Get Info.
Intel or PowerPC shows properly in Activity Monitor. I'v
At 12:00 PM +0100 2/4/09, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org apparently
wrote:
>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:50:17 +0100
>From: Jonas Maebe
>Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: building universal binary
>To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>Message-ID: <00e64550-ae30-4
On 03 Feb 2009, at 23:33, Ken G. Brown wrote:
Have a Pascal program calling some C code from a static library I
build in a separate project so I can use the debugger.
You can also build it in a separate target of the same project and
then change the target-specific flags for that C library (a
> > Have a Pascal program calling some C code from a static library I
> > build in a separate project so I can use the debugger.
>
>You can also build it in a separate target of the same project and
>then change the target-specific flags for that C library (as in the
>"FPC-C-C++ Carbon Applicati
Further:
it appears that lipo cannot handle app bundles, so if I run it on the
executable itself, it says it is ok, has both i386 and ppc. So I guess I'm
missing something that tells Finder it is a universal binary, but what?
Thx,
Ken G. Brown
At 12:21 PM -0700 2/3/09, Ken G. Brown apparently w
