OK, it seems that I should take the hardcoder approach :)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Using-LLVM-with-FPC-tp3199368p3200843.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Am 05.10.2010 16:58, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 05 Oct 2010, at 16:52, Sven Barth wrote:
But do you already generate LLVM code?
No, only translating FPC types into LLVM type definitions has been
implemented (but that's also the part that occasionally crashes since my
last merge from trunk).
O
On 05 Oct 2010, at 16:52, Sven Barth wrote:
But do you already generate LLVM code?
No, only translating FPC types into LLVM type definitions has been
implemented (but that's also the part that occasionally crashes since
my last merge from trunk).
Jonas
_
Am 05.10.2010 16:48, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 05 Oct 2010, at 16:41, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 16:06, schrieb leledumbo:
I believe that producing LLVM assembly is the best solution in the long
run.
That's what I'm going to do if no one else ever started it (I'll try
to make
it as mod
On 05 Oct 2010, at 16:41, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 16:06, schrieb leledumbo:
I believe that producing LLVM assembly is the best solution in the
long
run.
That's what I'm going to do if no one else ever started it (I'll
try to make
it as modular as possible so it can be used for
Am 05.10.2010 16:06, schrieb leledumbo:
I believe that producing LLVM assembly is the best solution in the long
run.
That's what I'm going to do if no one else ever started it (I'll try to make
it as modular as possible so it can be used for other projects)
I don't know how far Jonas is wit
> I believe that producing LLVM assembly is the best solution in the long
run.
That's what I'm going to do if no one else ever started it (I'll try to make
it as modular as possible so it can be used for other projects)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabb
