Cobines solution worked !
not tested constref.
2011/6/1 Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior :
> 2011/6/1 leledumbo :
>> Yep, this situation would confuse the compiler as it's possible to assign
>> descendant class instance to a class.
>> 1st solution: rename one of the constructor, don't need to use
>> vi
2011/6/1 leledumbo :
> Yep, this situation would confuse the compiler as it's possible to assign
> descendant class instance to a class.
> 1st solution: rename one of the constructor, don't need to use
> virtual/override
Its a class factory, i cannot have multiple constructors, so i need
virtual c
Yep, this situation would confuse the compiler as it's possible to assign
descendant class instance to a class.
1st solution: rename one of the constructor, don't need to use
virtual/override
2nd solution: try using constref instead of const (I hope constref has the
same semantics as var for classe
