> Furthermore, namespaces can be used to disambiguate identifiers with the
same name, eliminating the need to prefix our identifiers
How does that differ from existing . solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Namespaces-Support-tp5717153p571
> I know I'm a newbie in fpc, but I don't see backward compatibility a reason
enough to leave to implement some improvements, like organize the
base units of the fpc into proper namespaces.
Backward compatibility is what the market is mostly about, most companies
don't want to change their codebas
Thanks a lot!
2013/10/23 leledumbo
> > When the fpc 2.7.1 will be released?
>
> Since you ask this, obviously you don't understand fpc release engineering.
> This will enlighten you: http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#versions
>
> And as an answer to your question: it will NEVER be released, not
> When the fpc 2.7.1 will be released?
Since you ask this, obviously you don't understand fpc release engineering.
This will enlighten you: http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#versions
And as an answer to your question: it will NEVER be released, not as 2.7.1,
but probably as 2.8.0 or 3.0.0.
--
