On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Martin wrote:
> On 26/07/2010 15:36, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> {$NAMESPACE ON}
>> unit strutils namespace my;
>>
>> With {$NAMESPACE ON} all units will have namespaces, unless FPC's units.
>>
>
> Not sure why a directive?
>
> To allow none fully qualif
Hi everyone,
Could you please move this thread to the fpc-devel list?
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 26/07/2010 15:36, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
What about that the compiler enforces that you use the fully qualified name
if you used it in the uses?
Not only if you used it in the uses clause, but if you COMPILED with
namespace sinta
Op 2010-07-26 16:10, Sven Barth het geskryf:
>
> Are you sure that "_" is not allowed at the beginning of a unit name?
> Compiles without problems.
I wasn't. Thanks for confirming. So indeed the ugly _ syntax
can't be used.
I quite like Marcos Douglas's idea of using a colon between the namespac
Op 2010-07-26 16:23, Marcos Douglas het geskryf:
>>
>> Hmm... "~" looks ugly :P
>
> IMHO, is better to use the ':' like myspace:sysutils
That does indeed look better.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.or
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:23:31 -0300
> Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> IMHO, is better to use the ':' like myspace:sysutils
>
> Even better C++ style:
>
> uses
> myspace::sysutils;
>
> begin
> Exception; // no error
> SysUtils.Exception; //
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
>
> What about that the compiler enforces that you use the fully qualified name
> if you used it in the uses?
Not only if you used it in the uses clause, but if you COMPILED with
namespace sintaxe (eg. by Graeme unit strutils namespace my), IMHO
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:23:31 -0300
Marcos Douglas wrote:
> IMHO, is better to use the ':' like myspace:sysutils
Even better C++ style:
uses
myspace::sysutils;
begin
Exception; // no error
SysUtils.Exception; // identifier not found
MySpace::SysUtils.Exception; // no error
end.
R.
-
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 26.07.2010 16:06, Martin wrote:
But worst of all
uses sysutils; // the one from my project?
>>>
>>> No, because the RTL is not compiled with a namespace, so falls under the
>>> "global" namespace with takes preference
Hi!
On 26.07.2010 16:06, Martin wrote:
But worst of all
uses sysutils; // the one from my project?
No, because the RTL is not compiled with a namespace, so falls under the
"global" namespace with takes preference over project units or all other
namespaces. This then stays consistent with how de
Hi!
On 26.07.2010 15:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
uses rc.foo, my.foo, my; // there is a unit my
...
begin
foo.a; // error, which foo?
my.foo.a; // is that unit my, record foo.a OR unit my.foo ?
Good point, I haven't thought that far. I only worked though of the uses
clause. Maybe whe
On 26/07/2010 14:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Please note: I did not say my ideas are perfect, just that they are
suggestions that was put out there. Discussions regarding namespaces and
ideas/suggestions need to filter out the finer details of what could or
couldn't work. This is the whole point
Op 2010-07-26 14:34, Martin het geskryf:
> Let me see, if I got the idea (Graeme's idea) correct.
Please note: I did not say my ideas are perfect, just that they are
suggestions that was put out there. Discussions regarding namespaces and
ideas/suggestions need to filter out the finer details of w
On 25/07/2010 22:53, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 25 July 2010 23:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The discussion is not about namespaces. Object Pascal HAS namespaces,
namely units. The discussion is about 'enhancing' the namespace to allow one
or more dots in the name.
With the importa
Op 2010-07-26 11:34, Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:
>
> Well, I fail to see what is more logical in my.constants than in myconstants.
> The unit is still called my.constants, not constants. So you'll end up
> typing my.constants everywhere anyway. The gain of this over myconstants is
> highly de
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 25 July 2010 23:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The discussion is not about namespaces. Object Pascal HAS namespaces,
namely units. The discussion is about 'enhancing' the namespace to allow one
or more dots in the name.
With the importance t
On 25 July 2010 23:30, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The discussion is not about namespaces. Object Pascal HAS namespaces,
> namely units. The discussion is about 'enhancing' the namespace to allow one
> or more dots in the name.
With the importance that the '.' is only needed when resolving a
co
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 25 July 2010 19:16, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What unit name conflicts ? In 15 years that I work with Delphi and FPC, and
I have use many many packages, I encountered exactly 1 conflict:
Then you are extremely lucky. I have experience stack
On 25 July 2010 19:16, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> What unit name conflicts ? In 15 years that I work with Delphi and FPC, and
> I have use many many packages, I encountered exactly 1 conflict:
Then you are extremely lucky. I have experience stacks of unit name
conflicts in my years of programm
19 matches
Mail list logo
