Why not wxWidgets?
I'm not too familiar with wxWidgets, but
the headers sure look like C++ to me.
- Jeff
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Cesar Romero wrote:
> Why not wxWidgets?
> Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
> Windows to Native widget set
> Mac to Cocoa
>
> Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
Because no-one has started it yet.
And on Linux, I think it would be a very bad
On 8/19/06, Cesar Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not wxWidgets?
Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
Windows to Native widget set
Mac to Cocoa
Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
Too many layers perhaps... pascal -> wx -> gtk2 -> xlib
Also the need to set
Why not wxWidgets?
Linux map to GTK - GTK 2.0 alread done
Windows to Native widget set
Mac to Cocoa
Serious, I still dont undertande why not, is a licence issue?
[]s
Cesar Romero
http://blogs.liws.com.br/cesar
As promised, the documenation for fpGUI (not complete) is available on
the website
The documentation will be online over the weekend.
As promised, the documenation for fpGUI (not complete) is available on
the website at:
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/docs/
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freep
