On 13.02.2013 13:44, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 13/02/2013 12:31, Sven Barth wrote:
On 13.02.2013 12:41, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
[...]
But it's not just 'shorter', it's relatively 'safer' too, and
doesn't forbid anybody from using traditional constructs either, at
all, if they wish so/need so.
That'
On 13/02/2013 12:31, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 13.02.2013 12:41, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
[...]
>> But it's not just 'shorter', it's relatively 'safer' too, and
>> doesn't forbid anybody from using traditional constructs either, at
>> all, if they wish so/need so.
>
> That's for example a reason that spea
