2006/11/1, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 01 Nov 2006, at 21:43, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Binary search is complex because I have difficulties to get a FPC
> revision that will be able to compile latest Lazarus version...
> (unless I do not need to recompile my Laz each time but simple
>
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>> >
>> > For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
>> > the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this pr
On 01 Nov 2006, at 21:43, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
Binary search is complex because I have difficulties to get a FPC
revision that will be able to compile latest Lazarus version...
(unless I do not need to recompile my Laz each time but simple
replacing the fpcsrc & pp folders?)
Does ROPS dep
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the re
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the revision causing trouble?
Are ther
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
Can't you try the binary search to find the revision causing trouble?
Are there any fpc defines in the ROPS sources? Where are the
2006/10/31, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> > compiler
> > in svn. Is there a compiler switch required
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> compiler
> in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok?
> Using
> revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>> >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> compiler
> in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok?
> Using
> revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
> The parameters in the script when passed to
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote:
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>> That are 1300+ revisions. Try doing a binary search. That will take 11
>> tests.
>
> How do a do such a thing?
You know binary search right ? Use svn diff -r X, with X varying between
working and newest revision, until you found X-1 working, X not.
Micha
_
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
>T
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
>The parameters in the script
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
revision 3823 I have no problems.
The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
working well..
Hi all,
I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
revision 3823 I have no problems.
The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
working well.. this was an old bug... parameter
16 matches
Mail list logo
