Am 06.09.2012 09:27, schrieb Carlo Kok:
> Op 6-9-2012 02:43, Martin schreef:
>> On 06/09/2012 01:28, Alexander Hofmann wrote:
>>> You were right of course! I could have sweared I looked over the
>>> differences of x86 and x64 numerous times, but.. .well.
>>>
>>> After some copy'n'paste it work's li
Op 6-9-2012 02:43, Martin schreef:
On 06/09/2012 01:28, Alexander Hofmann wrote:
You were right of course! I could have sweared I looked over the
differences of x86 and x64 numerous times, but.. .well.
After some copy'n'paste it work's like a charm. Seems The only
difference is in calling Virtu
On 06/09/2012 01:28, Alexander Hofmann wrote:
You were right of course! I could have sweared I looked over the
differences of x86 and x64 numerous times, but.. .well.
After some copy'n'paste it work's like a charm. Seems The only
difference is in calling Virtual Constructors (it might not be the
Am 05.09.2012 20:18, schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
> Am 05.09.2012 18:27, schrieb Alexander Hofmann:
> o Called from FPC: rcx: 0 (nil), rdx: Class Reference, r8: Value of
> aOwner o Called from Script: rcx: Class Reference, rdx: 1 (!?), r8:
> Value of aOwner (at least so it seems)
>
> You need to adapt
Am 05.09.2012 18:27, schrieb Alexander Hofmann:
> Hi there.
>
> This is a cross-post (cross-mail ?) to
> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,17978.0.html as I got
> the hint there that it might be better to ask on the list instead of in
> the forum, at least concerning the calling co
Hi there.
This is a cross-post (cross-mail ?) to
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,17978.0.html as I got
the hint there that it might be better to ask on the list instead of in
the forum, at least concerning the calling conventions - but I'll ask
the whole lot, anyway; I hope that'
