Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
The ld manual page lists some options you can use to reduce its memory
usage:
* --no-keep-memory (makes it re-read object symbol tables from time to
time instead of keeping them in memory all the time)
* --reduce-memory-overheads (small hash tables a
Jonas Maebe wrote:
The ld manual page lists some options you can use to reduce its memory usage:
* --no-keep-memory (makes it re-read object symbol tables from time to time
instead of keeping them in memory all the time)
* --reduce-memory-overheads (small hash tables and slower but less
memory
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi Mark,
you wrote:
since I've not got GNU Screen
FYI: They say that tmux can be used under Solaris:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg0.html
Thanks Boris, I'll investigate although I must say that I'm being fairly
careful not to in
On 28 Dec 2010, at 13:17, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Thanks, I'd forgotten that site. Tries to tell me that CPU is 0.05 but still
> takes 10 secs to login- I'm pretty sure the whole system's thrashing...
> [applies ear to case] yup, it's thrashing.
The ld manual page lists some options you can
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 12:29, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
FPC works well enough to compile itself on Solaris (as discussed elsewhere) so
I've got no reason to think that things are totally broken. However I've not
got a number of tools that I rely heavily on when running Linux- in
On 28 Dec 2010, at 12:29, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> FPC works well enough to compile itself on Solaris (as discussed elsewhere)
> so I've got no reason to think that things are totally broken. However I've
> not got a number of tools that I rely heavily on when running Linux- in
> particular
Vincent Snijders wrote:
2010/12/28 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting
there locked up?
I d
2010/12/28 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
>>> the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting
>>> there locked up?
>>
>> No, the
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that the
linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting there
locked up?
No, there isn't. FPC currently does not show any output fro
On Tue, December 28, 2010 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> On low-spec systems (for example Linux on ARM with 32Mb or Solaris on
> SPARC with 128Mb) linking a large project such as the Lazarus IDE can
> take several days.
>
> Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
On 28 Dec 2010, at 11:04, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that the
> linker is actually doing something useful, rather than just sitting there
> locked up?
No, there isn't. FPC currently does not show any output from the linker, bu
On low-spec systems (for example Linux on ARM with 32Mb or Solaris on
SPARC with 128Mb) linking a large project such as the Lazarus IDE can
take several days.
Is it possible to get any sort of activity indication that confirms that
the linker is actually doing something useful, rather than jus
12 matches
Mail list logo
