> In the future, make this kind of comments in private,
Would you listen any more gracefully?
> not in the middle of a technical discussion.
It was related to the discussion. It was also a small proportion of the rest
of the email. 24 lines, only 4 related to this outburst. You are
overreacting.
On 11/3/06, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, whilst were speaking,
In the future, make this kind of comments in private, not in the
middle of a technical discussion. This has no place on this thread.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pasca
> How can I work around this? I mean, how can I redesign my idea to make
> it work with FP?
>
> Note that Qt requires that all methods to receive events, and signals
> be from objects (I cannot use a procedure to receive events).
In Delphi, I'd do it through interfaces. Delphi has this neat little
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to split the o-o wrappers around Qt procedural wrappers
> in 2 parts. One that depends on Lazarus and another that can be used
> with only Free Pascal.
>
> So I have some classes like this:
>
> TQtWidget = class(TObject)
>
> TQtFrame
Hello,
I was trying to split the o-o wrappers around Qt procedural wrappers
in 2 parts. One that depends on Lazarus and another that can be used
with only Free Pascal.
So I have some classes like this:
TQtWidget = class(TObject)
TQtFrame = class(TQtWidget)
Both classes contain mixed code for
