On 31 Jan 2010, at 15:44, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> Do we really need the message identifier in all methods?
No, only for new ones. When you override methods, implement methods from
protocols, or reintroduce methods via a category, you don't need it. Then the
compiler knows the sele
Hello,
Do we really need the message identifier in all methods? I mean, can't
the compiler just guess the name by substituting _ with : ? Then we
could use message only for those cases where the string it too long
for FPC to handle.
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 31 Jan 2010, at 12:47, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> It means/meant version one of the Objective-C language. The Objective-C
>> language evolves semi-independently of the run time (you can write programs
>> in Objective-C 2.0 running on i386 and p
On 31 Jan 2010, at 11:59, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> one more thing, is NSDelegatesAll not being build? I am trying to use
> it, but the compiler cannot find the unit. Maybe it is missing from
> the makefiles?
No. It doesn't even compile. It was added before FPC supported the objccateg
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Does the number 1 imply that it's version 1 of the mode and there may
be multiple versions supported at the same time? Or was it for
Objective C Runtime Library 1.0 ? (I am almost sure that not)
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >> Does the number 1 imply that it's version 1 of the mode and there may
> >> be multiple versions supported at the same time? Or was it for
> >> Objective C Runtime Library 1.0 ? (I am almost sure that not)
> >
> > It means/meant version one of
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 30 Jan 2010, at 20:08, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
One more thing, why is the modeswitch called objectivec1 ? It could be
objectivepascal instead.
Does the number 1 imply that it's version 1 of the mode and there may
be multiple versions su
Thanks again,
one more thing, is NSDelegatesAll not being build? I am trying to use
it, but the compiler cannot find the unit. Maybe it is missing from
the makefiles?
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
On 30 Jan 2010, at 20:08, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> One more thing, why is the modeswitch called objectivec1 ? It could be
> objectivepascal instead.
>
> Does the number 1 imply that it's version 1 of the mode and there may
> be multiple versions supported at the same time? Or was it
Thanks Jonas,
One more thing, why is the modeswitch called objectivec1 ? It could be
objectivepascal instead.
Does the number 1 imply that it's version 1 of the mode and there may
be multiple versions supported at the same time? Or was it for
Objective C Runtime Library 1.0 ? (I am almost sure th
On 28 Jan 2010, at 15:26, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I am having trouble with the delphi mode and objective pascal. If I
use this defines:
{$mode delphi}{$modeswitch objectivec1}
Then I get an error in this line:
MainWindow.contentView.addSubview(TextField);
simpleform.lpr(63,26) E
Hello,
I am having trouble with the delphi mode and objective pascal. If I
use this defines:
{$mode delphi}{$modeswitch objectivec1}
Then I get an error in this line:
MainWindow.contentView.addSubview(TextField);
simpleform.lpr(63,26) Error: Unknown record field identifier "ADDSUBVIEW"
And
12 matches
Mail list logo
