I made a typo which I didn't notice, thanks for the replies.
> On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:52:36 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (I sent this mail yesterday but somehow it didn't get trough, therefore
>> a
>> new try)
>>
>> I would like to declare a polymorph class. The class has several
>> prop
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 04:52:36 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I sent this mail yesterday but somehow it didn't get trough, therefore a
new try)
I would like to declare a polymorph class. The class has several
properties and it's the read and write specifiers that I want to be
virtual abstract
I would like to declare a polymorph class. The
class has several properties and it's the read and write specifiers that I want
to be virtual abstract. So derived classes override the read and write
specifiers. The problem however is that I get an EAbstractError. The
property is still conside
i'm new so grain of salt ...
On 3/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> function GetMyProperty: string; overload;
> procedure SetMyProperty(Value: string); overload;
should these be 'override' rather than 'overload' ?
--
X-SA user ? 0.4 is out !
http://x-plane.dsrts.com
(I sent this mail yesterday but somehow it didn't get trough, therefore a
new try)
I would like to declare a polymorph class. The class has several
properties and it's the read and write specifiers that I want to be
virtual abstract. So derived classes override the read and write
specifiers. The p
