Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
Adrian Veith wrote:
It shows with useless code like simple nested for .. to loops, but also
with some more useful code like the attached RSA_Angriff from the C'T
magazine.
My results are with:
fpc -Sd -OG3rp3 -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
5266 ms
with:
fpc -Sd -XX RSA
Adrian Veith wrote:
> It shows with useless code like simple nested for .. to loops, but also
> with some more useful code like the attached RSA_Angriff from the C'T
> magazine.
>
> My results are with:
>
> fpc -Sd -OG3rp3 -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
>
> 5266 ms
>
> with:
>
> fpc -Sd -XX RSA_Angrif
> It shows with useless code like simple nested for .. to loops, but also
> with some more useful code like the attached RSA_Angriff from the C'T
> magazine.
>
> My results are with:
>
> fpc -Sd -OG3rp3 -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
>
> 5266 ms
>
> with:
>
> fpc -Sd -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
>
> 4844 ms
>
>
It shows with useless code like simple nested for .. to loops, but also
with some more useful code like the attached RSA_Angriff from the C'T
magazine.
My results are with:
fpc -Sd -OG3rp3 -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
5266 ms
with:
fpc -Sd -XX RSA_Angriff_D5.dpr
4844 ms
The unoptimized code is
Adrian Veith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am newbie with fpc (but not with pascal, which I use more than 20y now).
> We have lot of existing delphi code, which some of it, I want to port to
> new platforms - and fpc looks like the right tool for it. But I am
> concerned about the speed. I did some basic be
Hi,
I am newbie with fpc (but not with pascal, which I use more than 20y now).
We have lot of existing delphi code, which some of it, I want to port to
new platforms - and fpc looks like the right tool for it. But I am
concerned about the speed. I did some basic benchmarks and it seems,
that t
