On 3/4/06, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will bring a tear to your eye then...
Oh no, please, I absolutely don´t want to know about your life.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
On Mar 4, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Matt Emson wrote:
Not so fresh, since it's the people that designed Delphi which
designed
C# and .NET, so actually you are doing more of the same.
Nothing is fresh in IT. OP originated (so I understand, at least
partially)
with additions to Pascal for MacOS.
> Not so fresh, since it's the people that designed Delphi which designed
> C# and .NET, so actually you are doing more of the same.
Nothing is fresh in IT. OP originated (so I understand, at least partially)
with additions to Pascal for MacOS.
God only knows what will happen now that Borland is
On 04 Mar 2006, at 21:12, Matt Emson wrote:
Not wishing to make this OT, but...
I'd like to ask everyone interested in continuing this topic to take
it to the fpc-other list.
Thanks,
Jonas
FPC mailing lists moderator.
___
fpc-pascal maillist
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Matt Emson wrote:
> This will bring a tear to your eye then... I have been a Delphi/Pascal
> programmer for 10 years. I recently began a transit process to C#, and .Net
> and I absolutely love it. It is a complete breath of fresh air.
Not so fresh, since it's the people that
Not wishing to make this OT, but...
> Talk to them about targets that c# does not reach, like *BSD, Mac OS
> X, Sparc, etc =)
Um.. *cough* Portable.NET, *cough* Mono. Both will get you on to most of
those platforms. Don't assume Microsoft needs all the answers. You can
certainly compile under Wi
> Please note that I am advocating Lazarus for the project.. I was
> responding to the project leader's (defacto at this point) call for
> pros and cons of each language. I and one other gentleman suggested
> FPC/Lazarus. I posted here precisely because I do not know what
> constitutes a "modern"
On 3/3/06, Matt Henley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several want to use C#. Two of us know and love Lazarus.
On Open Source projects the Developer is King. Talking doesn´t matter
much, what really matters is the code that is written.
If they don´t agree on making it a Lazarus software, ask them
Please note that I am advocating Lazarus for the project.. I was
responding to the project leader's (defacto at this point) call for
pros and cons of each language. I and one other gentleman suggested
FPC/Lazarus. I posted here precisely because I do not know what
constitutes a "modern" language.
Tony Pelton wrote:
it is *everything* that Java is, but better.
i feel like the hobbyist programmer in me has been reborn AND ... i've
actually started to look out into the job market a little, with an eye
towards maybe trying to make a jump from being a Java J2EE web
application developer to
> "My personal objective is not just to put out a simulator, but a fast
> and efficient simulator. Furthermore, personally, I do not consider a
> program portable if it is written in a language which very few can
> understand. A modern language such as any of the .NET languages will
> meet the ef
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:28:40 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Most people out there probably think of Pascal as still being in
> > the state it was in when Niklaus Wirth first designed it.
> >
> > Object Pascal to date is fully OOP, and misses
Thanks for all the replies, i will try to formulate an agrigate response.
On 3/3/06, Rodrigo Palhano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but not losing the focus, Pascal is a very modern language.
>
> On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:29:21 -0300, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006
but not losing the focus, Pascal is a very modern language.
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:29:21 -0300, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:14:41 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's simply not true. C++ has multiple inhe
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> > > classes in shared libraries
> >
> > So does FPC if you so desire ? The RTL can be compiled as a shared lib,
> > and that includes Classes...
>
> This is *very* recent stuff. Is it in 2.0.x yet? Does lazarus work properly
> with a shared LCL librar
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:14:41 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's simply not true. C++ has multiple inheritance,
>
> Solved by interfaces in a much cleaner way.
That doesn't solve the same problem. MI is much more powerful, but also
much more com
"multiple inheritance" what for?
"templates" is a specific resource, but ok.
"classes in shared libraries", delphi does have it.
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 14:57:07 -0300, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:28:40 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:28:40 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Most people out there probably think of Pascal as still being in
> > the state it was in when Niklaus Wirth first designed it.
> >
> > Obje
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:28:40 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most people out there probably think of Pascal as still being in
> the state it was in when Niklaus Wirth first designed it.
>
> Object Pascal to date is fully OOP, and misses nothing that C
Matt Henley wrote:
understand. A modern language such as any of the .NET languages will
meet the efficiency objective but portability remains an issue. While
I believe the with .Net, you will have the same speed issues that you
have with Python since it compiles to CLR and not native machine
Mild Pascal rant:
Thank you for considering Pascal. Contrary to popular belief, Pascal
is indeed a modern language. Though developed some time ago it has
evolved the to include most of the extensions seen in 'modern'
languages. It should be noted that modern is not synonymous with
recently
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Matt Henley wrote:
> I belong to a mailing list for a defunt open source chemical process
> simulator (Sim42). Members of the list are now showing interest in
> restarting the effort. It was originally written in python which
> cause some speed issues. Several of the list
I belong to a mailing list for a defunt open source chemical process
simulator (Sim42). Members of the list are now showing interest in
restarting the effort. It was originally written in python which
cause some speed issues. Several of the list members (including me)
suggested freepascal and la
23 matches
Mail list logo
