On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
Currently if I run "extractcssclasses" with Bootstrap 4 (or 5) CSS file (not
minified) I get it work for more than 30 seconds, then I stopped it, too
long.
Correct, there was an infinite loop. Is now fixed.
Michael.
_
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
I will add some options to interpret "*zoom" as a property name, but they
will
off by default.
OK thanks.
Can you try now with CSS (usual or minified) from
https:/
Currently if I run "extractcssclasses" with Bootstrap 4 (or 5) CSS file
(not minified) I get it work for more than 30 seconds, then I stopped
it, too long.
Output file (parameter "--output=4.txt") not created.
CPU Core i3. Linux x64.
AT
___
fpc-pascal
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
I will add some options to interpret "*zoom" as a property name, but they
will
off by default.
OK thanks.
Can you try now with CSS (usual or minified) from
https://getbootstrap.com/ ?
See 'download' which gives file bootstrap-5.1.3
I will add some options to interpret "*zoom" as a property name, but
they will
off by default.
OK thanks.
Can you try now with CSS (usual or minified) from
https://getbootstrap.com/ ?
See 'download' which gives file bootstrap-5.1.3-dist.zip .
Complex places:
.link-dark:hover, .link-dark:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
"*zoom", really ? That's not even valid CSS syntax.
I checked 2 EBNF grammars: neither will allow this. I checked the W3
spec: Confirms this is simply not valid synt
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
"*zoom", really ? That's not even valid CSS syntax.
I checked 2 EBNF grammars: neither will allow this. I checked the W3
spec: Confirms this is simply not valid syntax.
But "*.nnn" is valid one.
https://css-tricks.com/almanac/sele
"*zoom", really ? That's not even valid CSS syntax.
I checked 2 EBNF grammars: neither will allow this. I checked the W3
spec: Confirms this is simply not valid syntax.
But "*.nnn" is valid one.
https://css-tricks.com/almanac/selectors/u/universal/
So if the "*" has meaning in one context, it
On Sun, 27 Mar 2022, Alexey Torgashin via fpc-pascal wrote:
@Michael Van Canneyt
I didn't test but I hope this package can parse this _minified_ CSS file?
Minified or not is normally not relevant for parsing.
Attached on the forum
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,5885
@Michael Van Canneyt
I didn't test but I hope this package can parse this _minified_ CSS
file? Attached on the forum
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,58853.msg438550.html#msg438550
It has many tricks. E.g. @media blocks (@media supports nested blocks,
not only 1 level), e.
10 matches
Mail list logo
