Re: [fpc-pascal] More syntax questions (and more to follow)

2023-12-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote: Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: Thanks for the replies. Please note that the syntax diagrams are NOT meant to be exhaustive. They are an aid to explain the syntax. I strive to make them as correct as possible, but they mak

Re: [fpc-pascal] More syntax questions (and more to follow)

2023-12-16 Thread Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal wrote: Thanks for the replies. Please note that the syntax diagrams are NOT meant to be exhaustive. They are an aid to explain the syntax. I strive to make them as correct as possible, but they make no pretense to being complete. Anyway, I strive to make the

Re: [fpc-pascal] More syntax questions (and more to follow)

2023-12-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote: More questions about the FreePascal Language Reference (version 3.2.0) 1. Section 17.1 defines a rule and raise-statement = "raise" [ exception-instance [ exception-address ] ] . exception-address = "at" exception-address [ ","

[fpc-pascal] More syntax questions (and more to follow)

2023-12-16 Thread Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal
More questions about the FreePascal Language Reference (version 3.2.0) 1. Section 17.1 defines a rule and raise-statement = "raise" [ exception-instance [ exception-address ] ] . exception-address = "at" exception-address [ "," address-expression ] . a) Is it correct that d