On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:03:40 +0200
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Micha Nelissen schrieb:
> > Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >>> Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it.
> >>> We use multiple times login sometimes and then the settings are
> >>> always messed up.
> >>
> >> Well, t
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
And applications can implement a configuration file lock much easier if
they want to detect multiple activity.
Do they :)? Does lazarus?
IIRC OpenOffice (3.0) does detect it already and warn me.
Well, then you need two
Vincent Snijders wrote:
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default would
be a good idea.
Probably the choice to compile lazarus itself to its "configuration"
directory is not such a good idea ;-).
Micha
___
fpc-pascal mailli
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>> Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it. We use
>>> multiple times login sometimes and then the settings are always messed
>>> up.
>>
>> Well, this causes a headache with fully networked home drives as well ;)
>
> If c
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
My conclusion:
I agree with Jonas, you can use network shares for development machines..
Consider 10-50 people working and accessing a server this way :) Using
roaming profiles and local source checkouts, this can be handled easily
by a 1k Eur server which even doesn't r
Roaming profiles using auto copy/delete are not the best choice for that.
For me it works fine for years ;)
Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it.
As I wrote, the company I work for uses this setup for *all* (30,000+)
machines all over the world. And I doubt that it
Roaming profiles using auto copy/delete are not the best choice for that.
For me it works fine for years ;)
But not with Larazus, or? That's just the problem that it stores the
settings in parts of the profile that are *not* roamed/copied.
___
fpc-p
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it. We use
multiple times login sometimes and then the settings are always messed
up.
Well, this causes a headache with fully networked home drives as well ;)
If configuration files are per application it's
I wouldn't lose my settings on logoff. ;-)
Then don't. ;) Usually I just locked the machine overnight.
But as soon as I reboot my machine (for whatever reason and at whatever
day) I lose all my settings. I am not able to configurate anything
different from default because each reboot would ma
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>> Roaming profiles using auto copy/delete are not the best choice for
>>> that.
>>
>> For me it works fine for years ;)
>
> Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it. We use
> multiple times login sometimes and then the set
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Roaming profiles using auto copy/delete are not the best choice for that.
For me it works fine for years ;)
Then you must be the only one since everybody I know despises it. We use
multiple times login sometimes and then the settings are always messed
up. If the prof
Mattias Gärtner schrieb:
> Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
>
>> Mattias Gärtner schrieb:
>>> Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
>>>
> [...]
>> A network file system is too slow for developing. Compiling anything
>> via nfs or smb is a nightmare speedwise.
>
> NFS over gigabit is not that bad.
For how
I will make small patch(or some modify on code), i think it be more
understandable more than my bad language :)
--
Zaher Dirkey
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Thursday 16 July 2009, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> >> Well, this is happening now, since CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA isn't
> >> roamed.
> >
> > Yes. So what's the advantage in using the Lazarus directory
> > instead? ;)
>
> I wouldn't lose my settings on logoff. ;-)
Then don't. ;) Usually I just locked
Zitat von Zaher Dirkey :
Hi,
- "Use setup to define the link", i am compile Lazarus from the source
not install the by setup.
Is it bad idea to make Lazarus read ini/config file in same Lazarus
dir, if the file exists then read the path to config directory from
it, if not leave Lazarus as is.
Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
Mattias Gärtner schrieb:
Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
[...]
A network file system is too slow for developing. Compiling anything
via nfs or smb is a nightmare speedwise.
NFS over gigabit is not that bad.
For example compiling 94k lines of codetools on a networ
On 16 Jul 2009, at 16:35, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
A network file system is too slow for developing.
I do quite a bit of developing on an AFS volume. It's slower than
working locally of course, but it's quite doable in general.
Jonas
___
fpc-pas
Hi,
- "Use setup to define the link", i am compile Lazarus from the source
not install the by setup.
Is it bad idea to make Lazarus read ini/config file in same Lazarus
dir, if the file exists then read the path to config directory from
it, if not leave Lazarus as is.
Eclipse IDE ask to workspac
Mattias Gärtner schrieb:
Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:23 +0200
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Jürgen Hestermann, how often do you change your working machine?
Well, I seldom change it [...]
If I log off, the local profile is saved (partely) to
Zitat von Florian Klaempfl :
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:23 +0200
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Jürgen Hestermann, how often do you change your working machine?
Well, I seldom change it [...]
If I log off, the local profile is saved (partely) to the (Novell)
home dir and
Well, this is happening now, since CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA isn't roamed.
Yes. So what's the advantage in using the Lazarus directory instead? ;)
I wouldn't lose my settings on logoff. ;-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
On Thursday 16 July 2009, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> En/na Vinzent Hoefler ha escrit:
> > But you would lose your settings when changing the machine, because
> > then the settings aren't part of your profile anymore.
>
> Well, this is happening now, since CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA isn't roamed.
Yes. So what
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:23 +0200
> Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
>
>>> Jürgen Hestermann, how often do you change your working machine?
>> Well, I seldom change it [...]
>>
>> If I log off, the local profile is saved (partely) to the (Novell)
>> home dir and then the loca
En/na Michael Van Canneyt ha escrit:
I will attempt to solve the discussion:
AFAIK Lazarus uses the getappconfigdir() call. I'll add a optional
parameter
called 'Roaming', which defaults to 'False' (for backward compatibility),
and which can then be used to get the roaming profile directory.
O
En/na Vinzent Hoefler ha escrit:
But you would lose your settings when changing the machine, because then
the settings aren't part of your profile anymore.
Well, this is happening now, since CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA isn't roamed.
Bye
--
Luca
___
fpc-pasc
IMHO, that is more a problem of your novel setup than of Lazarus.
I don't think so. It's a vaild setup for Windows machines since many
years (see http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/3136.html). So
why consider all other setups but not this one?
Anyway you know now the trick: --pcp.
If I log off, the local profile is saved (partely) to the (Novell)
home dir and then the local Windows user is deleted completely (including the
profile!)
IMO: This type of sharing does not sound very suitable for a development
machine.
Our company has a world wide identical setup for computer
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:51:29 +0200
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> >> Therefore it would be the best of all worlds to save the Lazarus
> >> settings to the Lazarus directory.
> > No. A sane environment shouldn't even grant you write permissions
> > there.
>
> Then Lazarus should ask where to put the
Jürgen Hestermann schreef:
Therefore it would be the best of all worlds to save the Lazarus
settings to the Lazarus directory.
No. A sane environment shouldn't even grant you write permissions there.
Then Lazarus should ask where to put the settings on installation
because there are so many d
Therefore it would be the best of all worlds to save the Lazarus
settings to the Lazarus directory.
No. A sane environment shouldn't even grant you write permissions there.
Then Lazarus should ask where to put the settings on installation
because there are so many different configurations and
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:23 +0200
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> > Jürgen Hestermann, how often do you change your working machine?
>
> Well, I seldom change it [...]
>
> If I log off, the local profile is saved (partely) to the (Novell)
> home dir and then the local Windows user is deleted complet
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
On Thursday 16 July 2009, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default
would be a good idea.
That's true (although my settings are only 130 kB but they may grow).
Therefore it would be the best of all
On Thursday 16 July 2009, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> > I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default
> > would be a good idea.
>
> That's true (although my settings are only 130 kB but they may grow).
> Therefore it would be the best of all worlds to save the Lazarus
> settings
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default would
be a good idea.
That's true (although my settings are only 130 kB but they may grow).
Therefore it would be the best of all worlds to save the Lazarus
settings to the Lazarus directory. Then you would not have any problem
Jürgen Hestermann, how often do you change your working machine?
Well, I seldom change it and I would not even need the Lazarus settings
on other machines because I did not install it on these machines.
But our system works the following (I don't know whether it is specific
to our company or
Luca Olivetti schreef:
Well, I don't see why we can have only one config dir: windows offers
two (notwithstanding the fact that the whole roaming profile
implementation is moronic)
I see why: not yet implemented.
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
En/na Vincent Snijders ha escrit:
Yes, my lazarus directory is writable. The configuration directory
doesn't seem to me a suitable place for the executable.
That's why under windows you have both CSIDL_APPDATA and
CSIDL_LOCAL_APPDATA.
Correct. And that is why if you have only one config dir,
Florian Klaempfl schreef:
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
Jürgen Hestermann schreef:
definitely a drawback because you lose all your settings then!
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default would
be a good idea.
I've a roaming profile of several GB at work. If you don't ch
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
> Jürgen Hestermann schreef:
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and
not "Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would
be saved with roaming profiles too.
>>> Luca Olivetti schrieb:
>>> http://bugs.freepascal.org/
Luca Olivetti schreef:
En/na Vincent Snijders ha escrit:
Luca Olivetti schreef:
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default
would be a good idea.
My lazarus config directory is 254K under windows and 196K under linux.
I guess your lazarus directory is either writabl
En/na Vincent Snijders ha escrit:
Luca Olivetti schreef:
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default
would be a good idea.
My lazarus config directory is 254K under windows and 196K under linux.
I guess your lazarus directory is either writable or you didn't install
Luca Olivetti schreef:
I am not sure having a 100 MB lazarus *roaming* profile by default
would be a good idea.
My lazarus config directory is 254K under windows and 196K under linux.
I guess your lazarus directory is either writable or you didn't install
components. Otherwise you have a l
En/na Vincent Snijders ha escrit:
Jürgen Hestermann schreef:
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and
not "Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would
be saved with roaming profiles too.
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=
Jürgen Hestermann schreef:
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and
not "Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would be
saved with roaming profiles too.
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13908
Interesting that noone ment
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and
not "Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would be
saved with roaming profiles too.
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13908
Interesting that noone mentioned the impact on roamed p
En/na Jürgen Hestermann ha escrit:
> Zaher Dirkey schrieb:
use c:\lazarus\Lazarus.exe --pcp=x:\lazarus\config
Thanks for the solution!
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and not
"Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would be saved
with roamin
> Zaher Dirkey schrieb:
use c:\lazarus\Lazarus.exe --pcp=x:\lazarus\config
Thanks for the solution!
Still I am wondering why the directory "Local Settings" is used and not
"Application Data" as all other applications do. Then it would be saved
with roaming profiles too.
___
use
c:\lazarus\Lazarus.exe --pcp=x:\lazarus\config
--
Zaher Dirkey
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi,
I don't know the answer for your question but I know a separate Lazarus
mailing list exist.
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Gabor
Jürgen Hestermann írta:
I am not sure whether there exists a separate mailing list just for
Lazarus so I am posting this here:
I am not sure whether there exists a separate mailing list just for
Lazarus so I am posting this here:
I have seen a small discussion on
http://www.mail-archive.com/laza...@miraclec.com/msg20274.html about
where Lazarus stores its configuration settings. I wanted to mention
that I have a prob
50 matches
Mail list logo
