Re: [fpc-pascal] Language mode, assembler style

2012-08-25 Thread Sven Barth
On 25.08.2012 12:22, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: Because only for modes TP and Delphi the default style is Intel instead of AT&T which was chosen as the default for FPC (not the mode, but the compiler) on x86 systems. And before you ask: I don't know why

Re: [fpc-pascal] Language mode, assembler style

2012-08-25 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said: > Because only for modes TP and Delphi the default style is Intel instead > of AT&T which was chosen as the default for FPC (not the mode, but the > compiler) on x86 systems. > > And before you ask: I don't know why AT&T was chosen as default, maybe > b

Re: [fpc-pascal] Language mode, assembler style

2012-08-25 Thread Sven Barth
On 25.08.2012 12:00, Rainer Stratmann wrote: Why is -Mfpc the default language style? > I assume -Mobjfpc or -M2 is the most used style. > "fpc" was the first mode that FPC supported, so that's kept because of backwards compatibility. Why does -Mobjfpc overwrite the assember style? Becau

Re: [fpc-pascal] Language mode, assembler style

2012-08-25 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 25 Aug 2012, at 12:00, Rainer Stratmann wrote: > Why is -Mfpc the default language style? For backward compatibility. > Why does -Mobjfpc overwrite the assember style? Language modes set all language-related switches to the default for that mode, so that it is possible to e.g. add {$mode o

[fpc-pascal] Language mode, assembler style

2012-08-25 Thread Rainer Stratmann
Why is -Mfpc the default language style? I assume -Mobjfpc or -M2 is the most used style. Why does -Mobjfpc overwrite the assember style? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal