> I didn't implement verification, and I don't plan any.
> But contributions are welcome.
Looks like a new entry in hmac unit + new sha256 unit would be needed. Codes
are around the net but sticking to existing hash package citizens would be
better for FPC future. Hope my crypto skill still stan
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, leledumbo wrote:
Some questions:1. How to verify the signature? My grep result in packages
folder doesn't show that we have HMAC256 function.
I didn't implement verification, and I don't plan any.
But contributions are welcome.
2. The following
sample:{$mode objfpc}{$
Some questions:1. How to verify the signature? My grep result in packages
folder doesn't show that we have HMAC256 function.2. The following
sample:{$mode objfpc}{$H+}uses fpjwt, jsonparser;const EncodedStr =
'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIi
> See:
>
> fcl-web/src/base/fpjwt.pp
Ah, didn't notice this unit. Perhaps it was on the same batch as google API?
Thanks anyway, always love FPC because of this provided non-trivial
functionalities :)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/JSON-Web-T
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, leledumbo wrote:
Is there anyone already implements https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7519? I
find a Delphi implementation
(https://github.com/paolo-rossi/delphi-jose-jwt), but it uses the new Delphi
RTL with System. namespace. I don't want to reinvent the wheel if possible,
s
Is there anyone already implements https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7519? I
find a Delphi implementation
(https://github.com/paolo-rossi/delphi-jose-jwt), but it uses the new Delphi
RTL with System. namespace. I don't want to reinvent the wheel if possible,
so if there's already one for FPC, that wou
