On Tue, September 8, 2015 11:43, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:21:18 +0200
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
Sharing the response from Mattias Gaertner (for Lazarus) below with the
original poster in Cc: (since he isn't subscribed to the mailing list).
Tomas
>
>>[...]
>> > I do think th
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:21:18 +0200
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>[...]
> > I do think that Steph means the FPC tar as Lazarus does AFAIK not have a
> > tar-installer like FPC does...
True.
It provides a source tar (and a zip) though.
> Alright, could be. However, if this is the case, I'm afraid that t
On Tue, September 8, 2015 11:10, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 08.09.2015 09:04 schrieb "Tomas Hajny" :
>> > To come back to the response on my email: I've started off by
>> > downloading the lazarus1.4.2.deb file (I use Ubuntu 14.04) and used
>> > gdebi and later dpkg without success, the message was con
Am 08.09.2015 09:04 schrieb "Tomas Hajny" :
> > To come back to the response on my email: I've started off by
> > downloading the lazarus1.4.2.deb file (I use Ubuntu 14.04) and used
> > gdebi and later dpkg without success, the message was consistently the
> > fpc > 2.6.4 was required, and although
On Mon, September 7, 2015 22:36, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
Hello Steph,
> Thanks for the reply, you are more than welcome to register my email on
> your mailing list. I got the email address in a google search when I
> searched for a solution.
If you decide to subscribe to the list, please, do it
In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
> >
> > On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Michael
> >>
> >> When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user:
> >> ?michael:michael?", do you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
> >
> > Most likely, this is for the
Thanks for the reply, you are more than welcome to register my email on
your mailing list. I got the email address in a google search when I
searched for a solution.
To come back to the response on my email: I've started off by
downloading the lazarus1.4.2.deb file (I use Ubuntu 14.04) and use
6On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On 09/07/2015 08:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
Dear Michael
When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user:
‘michael:michael’", do you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
Most li
On 09/07/2015 08:44 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
Dear Michael
When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user:
‘michael:michael’", do you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
Most likely, this is for the documentation.
Michael, didn
On Mon, September 7, 2015 08:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
>
>> Dear Michael
>>
>> When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user: ‘michael:michael’",
>> do
>> you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
>
> Most likely, this is for the documen
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
Dear Michael
When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user: ‘michael:michael’", do
you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
Most likely, this is for the documentation.
What did you use to install FPC ?
Michael.__
Dear Michael
When installing fpc I get the meassge "invalid user: ‘michael:michael’",
do you have any suggestion on where I must chown?
You're assistance will be appreciated.
Kind regards
--
*/Steph Bredenhann/* PrEng, PrCPM
(sent from SJB-Linux)
__
On 1/15/2012 18:41, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sun, January 15, 2012 23:43, waldo kitty wrote:
Thanks for letting me know about it. I suggest that you file a
standard bug report (not that I expect anyone else to fix it if the
problem is restricted to the OS/2 version, but it becomes visible for
other
On Sun, January 15, 2012 23:43, waldo kitty wrote:
.
.
> i didn't think so, either... i mean, it would seem that fpc looks in the
> current
> directory already... as such, it doesn't list the .\ directory in its
> list... fp
> seems to need this additional assistance, maybe? ;)
link.res is only
On 1/15/2012 17:17, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On 15 Jan 12, at 13:31, waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/14/2012 16:49, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Any difference between link.res file created in the two cases?
yes...
the first thing i note is the fp link.res includes the .\ directory and the fpc
one does not... indic
On 15 Jan 12, at 13:31, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/14/2012 16:49, Tomas Hajny wrote:
.
.
> > Any difference between link.res file created in the two cases?
>
> yes...
>
> the first thing i note is the fp link.res includes the .\ directory and the
> fpc
> one does not... indicated with a 1 belo
On 1/14/2012 16:49, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Is there any difference between ppas.cmd created by fp.exe and fpc.exe if
you add option -s to compilation from both?
i can't find a ppas.cmd when i use "fp -s" and hit F9 or ALT-F9 to compile... it
still fails with an error linking... i am allowing the d
On Sat, January 14, 2012 18:38, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/14/2012 08:06, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On 14 Jan 12, at 5:13, waldo kitty wrote:
>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
.
.
>> Yes, that certainly makes sense. My point was mainly -
On 1/14/2012 08:06, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On 14 Jan 12, at 5:13, waldo kitty wrote:
On 1/13/2012 12:24, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
.
.
i use 4OS2 and both return the same path...
>which as
209 rwx 1 bin 212992 Feb 23 2004 10:43:38 h:\fp\2.6.
On 14 Jan 12, at 5:13, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/13/2012 12:24, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> > On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
.
.
> i use 4OS2 and both return the same path...
>
> >which as
>209 rwx 1 bin 212992 Feb 23 2004 10:43:38 h:\fp\2.6.0\bin\os2\as.exe
>
> >which ld
>
On 1/13/2012 12:24, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
[time passes]
ok, i figured out how to compile with -s and then i ran the ppas.cmd
file... it apparently has completed successfully... i do have a bright
shiny new exe file... now to figure out what's wron
On 13 Jan 12, at 18:24, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
> > On 1/13/2012 05:40, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> >> On Fri, January 13, 2012 11:27, waldo kitty wrote:
.
.
> > when i looked at it just now, the LIBPATH is set to h:\fp\2.6.0\bin\dll
> > when it
> > should
On Fri, January 13, 2012 16:48, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 1/13/2012 05:40, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Fri, January 13, 2012 11:27, waldo kitty wrote:
>>>
>>> i've a problem with os2260full... i bit the bullet and wiped my old os2
>>> 2.4.0(?? or 2.4.2???) install... now none of my projects compile...
>
On 1/13/2012 05:40, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Fri, January 13, 2012 11:27, waldo kitty wrote:
i've a problem with os2260full... i bit the bullet and wiped my old os2
2.4.0(?? or 2.4.2???) install... now none of my projects compile... they
complain about "Error: Can't call the assembler, error -1 sw
On Fri, January 13, 2012 11:27, waldo kitty wrote:
>
> i've a problem with os2260full... i bit the bullet and wiped my old os2
> 2.4.0(??
> or 2.4.2???) install... now none of my projects compile... they complain
> about
> "Error: Can't call the assembler, error -1 switching to external
> assemblin
i've a problem with os2260full... i bit the bullet and wiped my old os2 2.4.0(??
or 2.4.2???) install... now none of my projects compile... they complain about
"Error: Can't call the assembler, error -1 switching to external assembling"...
in downloaded os2260full.zip, transferred it to the o
The RPM and deb's are generated if there is enough interest
Looking at
http://www.freepascal.org/down/x86_64/linux-ftp.freepascal.org.var the
rpm is already there.
Ubuntu/MInt users should have the 'alien' tool in their repositories
which can easily create a usable .deb file from a .rpm
In our previous episode, Peter said:
> > If you look carefully, you'll see the 64-bit 2.4.4 .deb releases are not
> > even
> > generated. {in ftp.hu.freepascal.org}
> >
>
> Good point. In addition to the Debian packages I mentioned earlier there
> is a complete single file tar-ball here for
If you look carefully, you'll see the 64-bit 2.4.4 .deb releases are not even
generated. {in ftp.hu.freepascal.org}
Good point. In addition to the Debian packages I mentioned earlier there
is a complete single file tar-ball here for x86_64
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86
Am Thursday 16 June 2011 14:59:31 schrieb Juha Manninen:
> 2011/6/16 Rainer Stratmann
>
> > Am Thursday 16 June 2011 00:34:15 schrieb Juha Manninen:
> > > Linux is still a superior platform for open-source software.
> >
> > Unfortunately
> >
> > > for commercial software it is not.
> >
> > That's
2011/6/16 Rainer Stratmann
> Am Thursday 16 June 2011 00:34:15 schrieb Juha Manninen:
> > Linux is still a superior platform for open-source software.
> Unfortunately
> > for commercial software it is not.
> That's not true. Look at http://www.cadsoft.de
>
Interesting. I still believe you have s
> It is unfair to try to push this onto the
> central developers that already have enough work to do.
>
I understand and appreciate all the effort that has been put into this
project and you won't see me pushing additional work to the central
developpers. That is also why I'm trying to be const
In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said:
> fpc_2.4.4-0_all.deb is just a meta package and needs a repository to pull in
> the other packages. Hence my earlier suggestion + quick fix to "upgrade"
> ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/ to a
> depository. But nobody seems t
fpc_2.4.4-0_all.deb is just a meta package and needs a repository to pull in
the other packages. Hence my earlier suggestion + quick fix to "upgrade"
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/ to a
depository. But nobody seems to be interested...
Ludo
>
> If folks prefer to
Am Thursday 16 June 2011 00:34:15 schrieb Juha Manninen:
> Linux is still a superior platform for open-source software. Unfortunately
> for commercial software it is not.
That's not true. Look at http://www.cadsoft.de
> There is not one Linux but many variations, and supporting binary installs
> fo
> On 15 June 2011 22:31, DaWorm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ludo Brands
> > wrote:
> >> We were talking to make fpc easier to install for the
> average ubuntu
> >> user. This is as clear as mud for the average user I would say.
> >
> > Well, one would hope the average develope
Thanks, there are many ways to install.
I used the Bart's system which is easy although it bypasses the package
manager.
I believe the Linux installation could be improved with "build-servers" like
Suse has and other distros, too.
There is no fundamental problem with it.
Linux is still a superior
If folks prefer to stick with
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/
then fpc_2.4.4-0_all.deb is probably the [single meta]package to install.
A readme file in the folder clearly explaining that would be helpful.
On 15/06/11 22:08, Ludo Brands wrote:
Adding debian unsta
On 15 June 2011 22:31, DaWorm wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
>> We were talking to make fpc easier to install for the average ubuntu user.
>> This is as clear as mud for the average user I would say.
>
> Well, one would hope the average developer would be a bit farth
On 15 June 2011 22:08, Ludo Brands wrote:
>> > Adding debian unstable repositories in Ubuntu is asking for
>> trouble.
>> > Next time you upgrade your packages you can be in deep s**t.
>>
>> Just make sure you pin the unstable repo lower than
>> everything else, then use:
>
> We were talking to ma
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> We were talking to make fpc easier to install for the average ubuntu user.
> This is as clear as mud for the average user I would say.
Well, one would hope the average developer would be a bit farther
along the learning curve than the average
> > Adding debian unstable repositories in Ubuntu is asking for
> trouble.
> > Next time you upgrade your packages you can be in deep s**t.
>
> Just make sure you pin the unstable repo lower than
> everything else, then use:
We were talking to make fpc easier to install for the average ubuntu
On 15 June 2011 19:26, Ludo Brands wrote:
> Adding debian unstable repositories in Ubuntu is asking for trouble. Next
> time you upgrade your packages you can be in deep s**t.
Just make sure you pin the unstable repo lower than everything else, then use:
apt-get -t unstable install fpc-2.4.4 (to
Peter
> Envoyé : mercredi 15 juin 2011 19:28
> À : fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] Installing FPC 2.4.4 for Ubuntu /
> Mint + otherthoughts
>
>
> >> "Am I really supposed to download those ~40 packages separately"
>
> U
"Am I really supposed to download those ~40 packages separately"
Usually, in situations like this, one just installs a meta package with a
package manager.
The meta package is just a list of required dependencies, and downloads other
packages as needed.
I installed this one.
http://packages.
Resend: Outlook keeps converting to html messages...
A quick improvement for
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/ is to
"upgrade" it to a repository.
Include the attached file in the above directory and you can access it as
normal repository by adding "deb
ftp://ftp.hu.f
al-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Juha Manninen
Envoyé : mardi 14 juin 2011 19:12
À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
Objet : [fpc-pascal] Installing FPC 2.4.4 for Ubuntu / Mint + other thoughts
I found the packages for Debian / Ubuntu / Mint :
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dis
Juha,
> I just want to
> have a working compiler for Lazarus SVN versions but it is difficult.
Yes, I recognize this from the past...
This is how I set it up on Suse 10.0
(I cannot use the rpm's my Suse is just too old, it refuses installing
fpc rpm's since long time ago)
Go to the general downl
Has anybody looked into creating an Ubuntu PPA?
Ludo
-Message d'origine-
De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
[mailto:fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Juha Manninen
Envoyé : mardi 14 juin 2011 19:12
À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
Objet : [fpc-p
On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:12, Juha Manninen wrote:
> I found the packages for Debian / Ubuntu / Mint :
> ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/
>
> How to install it?
> Am I really supposed to download those ~40 packages separately
Yes. I guess we can also add a tar file tha
I found the packages for Debian / Ubuntu / Mint :
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/2.4.4/i386-linux/deb/
How to install it?
Am I really supposed to download those ~40 packages separately and then
install them in some specific order?
Other people have brougt this up, too, and I understand w
Hello,
Ok, I managed to fix my problem:
user-46-113-147-187:carbon felipe$ cd /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.5.1/
user-46-113-147-187:2.5.1 felipe$ which fpcres
/usr/local/bin/fpcres
user-46-113-147-187:2.5.1 felipe$ sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/fpcres fpcres
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
Ok, very wierd now =D
If I go to the command line and type:
user-46-113-151-158:cocoa felipe$ /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.5.1/ppc386
-MObjFPC -Scghi -O1 -gl -k-framework -kCocoa -WG -vewnhi -l
-Filib/i386-darwin -Fu../../lazarus/lcl/units/i386-darwin/cocoa
-Fu../../lazarus/lcl/units/i386-darwin
-Fu../.
2011/4/15 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Jonas Maebe
> wrote:
>> And does it work when you manually execute it?
>
> As in just typing: fpcres ?
>
IIRC, with -va or -vd, ppc386 shows the fpcres command line. Can you use that?
Vincent
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> And does it work when you manually execute it?
As in just typing: fpcres ?
Yes, then it shows a help message
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.
On 15 Apr 2011, at 15:46, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
5> Build a trivial LCL project, I get somethink like this as an error:
Cannot find Resource Compiler fpcres
But it is in my path =o
And does it work when you manually execute it? It's also in my path
and compiling with FPC 2.5.1
Hello,
I am trying to install FPC 2.5.1 in Mac OS X. So I tryed this steps:
1> I have FPC 2.4.2 working fine
2>
cd fpctrunk
make clean
make all
sudo make install
3> In Lazarus set the new compiler to /usr/local/bin/fpc/2.5.1/ppc386
4> Build LCL-Cocoa (works fine)
5> Build a trivial LCL proje
2011/2/4 Rogério Martins :
> Hi !
> How can i download and install fpc 2.5.1 from svn in my ubuntu 10.04 x86_64
> ?
http://freepascal.org/develop.var#svn
You will need a starting compiler, so download and install the latest
release. Then execute:
make
make install
(this installs to /usr/local
Hi !
How can i download and install fpc 2.5.1 from svn in my ubuntu 10.04 x86_64
?
Thanks
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:29:57AM +0200, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> >Hello,
> >
> >
> >Are there better ways to install fpc 2.2.0 on ubuntu besides downloading
> >~15 debs
> >from sourceforge ? I'm thinking that it would be much more convenient to
> >have all those
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Hello,
Are there better ways to install fpc 2.2.0 on ubuntu besides downloading ~15
debs
from sourceforge ? I'm thinking that it would be much more convenient to have
all those
debs packaged into a single tar . Or maybe there is some deb repository
available ?
Hello,
Are there better ways to install fpc 2.2.0 on ubuntu besides downloading ~15
debs
from sourceforge ? I'm thinking that it would be much more convenient to have
all those
debs packaged into a single tar . Or maybe there is some deb repository
available ?
Thanks,
Adrian Maier
> This package installs fine but fp IDE doesn't work. It still requires
> libtinfo.so.5 :( . Some students of my university likes Turbo Pascal
> then, I thinks that fp IDE would not scare them...
There was some similar bugreport from a SUSE user. We devised a fix, and he
afaik managed to build SUS
Hi Coco,
This package installs fine but fp IDE doesn't work. It still requires
libtinfo.so.5 :( . Some students of my university likes Turbo Pascal
then, I thinks that fp IDE would not scare them...
2007/10/28, Coco Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paulo Estrela schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying
Paulo Estrela schreef:
Hi,
I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet related to this. Anyone
with same problem or any idea?
I'm running FPC 2.2.0 on CentO
Thanks Florian!
2007/10/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paulo Estrela schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
> > package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
> > lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet re
Paulo Estrela schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
> package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
> lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet related to this. Anyone
> with same problem or any idea?
http://www.freepascal.
Hi,
I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet related to this. Anyone
with same problem or any idea?
Thanks
Paulo Estrela
___
68 matches
Mail list logo
