On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> I think one of the prime requirements to get readable code is that a
> compilable expression always means the same.
Other forms of polymorphism can also lead to violations of this
requirement. Basically I think it should be left to the user
JC Chu wrote on Thu, 13 Sep 2012:
Regarding bug #22860 on the inability to define enumeration members
using expressions containing previously defined members of the same
type, the current fix does not provide a complete solution.
The current fix won’t allow for valid declarations such as TYPE
Jonas,
Regarding bug #22860 on the inability to define enumeration members
using expressions containing previously defined members of the same
type, the current fix does not provide a complete solution.
The current fix won’t allow for valid declarations such as TYPE
TMyEnum = (meA, meB = 1 + meA)
