Am 07.07.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 07.07.2019 um 02:55 schrieb Ralf Quint:
On 7/6/2019 12:21 PM, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 05.07.2019 um 13:53 schrieb Ralf Quint:
Shouldn't a PACKED Record guarantee that values are aligned at the
byte
level?
It does in TP, but the ISO says only t
Am 07.07.2019 um 02:55 schrieb Ralf Quint:
On 7/6/2019 12:21 PM, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 05.07.2019 um 13:53 schrieb Ralf Quint:
Shouldn't a PACKED Record guarantee that values are aligned at the byte
level?
It does in TP, but the ISO says only that it shall be economised.
Well, the ISO is
On 7/6/2019 12:21 PM, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 05.07.2019 um 13:53 schrieb Ralf Quint:
Shouldn't a PACKED Record guarantee that values are aligned at the byte
level?
It does in TP, but the ISO says only that it shall be economised.
Well, the ISO is probably what has done most of the damage t
Am 05.07.2019 um 13:53 schrieb Ralf Quint:
> On 7/5/2019 3:27 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>
>> Op 2019-07-05 om 11:49 schreef Bernd Oppolzer:
>>>
>>> IMO, the variants in a variant record should always overlay correctly
>>> (like unions in C),
>>> so the variant part should start at offset 32 in
On 7/5/2019 5:07 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Op 2019-07-05 om 13:53 schreef Ralf Quint:
IMO, the variants in a variant record should always overlay
correctly (like unions in C),
so the variant part should start at offset 32 in this case, and
this is where all three
variants should start.
Op 2019-07-05 om 13:53 schreef Ralf Quint:
IMO, the variants in a variant record should always overlay
correctly (like unions in C),
so the variant part should start at offset 32 in this case, and this
is where all three
variants should start.
This is not a guarantee case in the Pascal lang
On 7/5/2019 3:27 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Op 2019-07-05 om 11:49 schreef Bernd Oppolzer:
IMO, the variants in a variant record should always overlay correctly
(like unions in C),
so the variant part should start at offset 32 in this case, and this
is where all three
variants should sta
Op 2019-07-05 om 11:49 schreef Bernd Oppolzer:
IMO, the variants in a variant record should always overlay correctly
(like unions in C),
so the variant part should start at offset 32 in this case, and this
is where all three
variants should start.
This is not a guarantee case in the Pascal
On 2019-07-05 11:49, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
This question is not directly related to FPC, but it is instead a
Pascal question in general.
.
.
BTW: is there a forum to discuss general Pascal questions not directly
related to the FPC product?
FPC-Pascal will sure be the largest auditorium availa
This question is not directly related to FPC, but it is instead a Pascal
question in general.
Take this record definition:
type S1 = record
X : CHAR ( 27 ) ;
case INTEGER of
1 :
( V : INTEGER ) ;
2 :
( W : REAL
10 matches
Mail list logo
