2008/9/21 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are some possibilities to increase the speed of your lazarus software:
>
> * Use gtk 1
> * Use Qt 4 (needs a commercial license for non-gpl software)
> * Improving the fpgui interface to Lazarus and use that. You can test
> the exis
2008/9/20 Koenraad Lelong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--8<--
>
> Regarding my Arcom ( board : it's a Viper 400 M64 F32. I purchased the
> Linux dev. kit with the LCD, which contains all you need to develop in
> C. I'm using fpc :-).
excellent. i've got a vulcan, which is big-endian (with fpu), and a
qua
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:10 -0300, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Den Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you notice this:
> > http://www.klc.net.nz/linux/?page_id=13
>
> kool!! So lcl-qt is already working with qtopia, is that it?
>
guess I should upda
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What to test there? A form and a button? Other widgetset are not implemented
> there and graphic too.
If you re-read my e-mail:
* Improving the fpgui interface to Lazarus and use that.
I think I made it clear that one wou
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Den Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you notice this:
> http://www.klc.net.nz/linux/?page_id=13
kool!! So lcl-qt is already working with qtopia, is that it?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Paul Ishenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What to test there? A form and a button? Other widgetset are not implemented
> there and graphic too.
There was a very vague description about it being slow, so anything
could be slow, even a button. If only some parts are
Paul Ishenin wrote:
... Other widgetset are not implemented there and graphic too.
Read as "other widgets" (or other controls).
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mail
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I think it would be very interresting if you test the lazarus-fpgui
interface. I wonder if it performs better then gtk2, which give a
higher value to investing time in it.
What to test there? A form and a button? Other widgetset are not
implemented there and
On Sunday 21 September 2008 12:28:29 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> * Use Qt 4 (needs a commercial license for non-gpl software)
Did you notice this:
http://www.klc.net.nz/linux/?page_id=13
regards,
Den Jean
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pasca
There are some possibilities to increase the speed of your lazarus software:
* Use gtk 1
* Use Qt 4 (needs a commercial license for non-gpl software)
* Improving the fpgui interface to Lazarus and use that. You can test
the existing one to see if it has a higher speed. Information in the
wiki:
ht
Florian Klaempfl schreef:
> Koenraad Lelong schrieb:
>> Frank de Groot / Rent-a-Geek schreef:
>>> I was wondering, what exactly is slow in Lazarus, because I use it via
>>> remote desktop over a long-distance WiFi connection and it still is very
>>> fast..?
>>>
P.S. I can't recommend Lazarus.
Koenraad Lelong schrieb:
Frank de Groot / Rent-a-Geek schreef:
I was wondering, what exactly is slow in Lazarus, because I use it via
remote desktop over a long-distance WiFi connection and it still is very
fast..?
From: "Koenraad Lelong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P.S. I can't recommend Lazarus. I
On Saturday 20 September 2008 12.20:38 Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> Henry Vermaak schreef:
> > hmm, is -lc passed to arm-linux-ld? you might have to add -k-lc to
> > the fpc command line. btw, which arcom board do you have? i'm
> > getting a new one very soon, so we can team up on this :)
> >
> > he
Frank de Groot / Rent-a-Geek schreef:
> I was wondering, what exactly is slow in Lazarus, because I use it via
> remote desktop over a long-distance WiFi connection and it still is very
> fast..?
>
>
> From: "Koenraad Lelong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> P.S. I can't recommend Lazarus. It works but
I was wondering, what exactly is slow in Lazarus, because I use it via
remote desktop over a long-distance WiFi connection and it still is very
fast..?
From: "Koenraad Lelong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P.S. I can't recommend Lazarus. It works but it's slow. I use MSEgui.
Some time I'm going to try
Henry Vermaak schreef:
>
> hmm, is -lc passed to arm-linux-ld? you might have to add -k-lc to
> the fpc command line. btw, which arcom board do you have? i'm
> getting a new one very soon, so we can team up on this :)
>
> henry
Thanks, the application compiles and links on my host. It runs on
On 17/09/2008, Koenraad Lelong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, but I do have -Fl/opt/arcom/arm-linux/lib/* in the script and
> /opt/arcom/arm-linux/lib contains a libc.a, libc.so, libc.so.6 and a
> libc-2.3.3.so. I tried with -Fl/opt/arcom/arm-linux/lib with the same
> result.
> libc.a contain
Henry Vermaak schreef:
> 2008/9/15 Koenraad Lelong :
>>
>>
...
>> I think I'm missing some file to link in, but I think I included every
>
> seems like it's not finding libc?
>
> henry
Thanks, but I do have -Fl/opt/arcom/arm-linux/lib/* in the script and
/opt/arcom/arm-linux/lib contains a l
On 07 Sep 2008, at 14:35, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Google helped me understand the "volatile" keyword, but is there a
Pascal alternative ?
No. FPC is at this time unlikely to perform any optimisations on
pointer or global variables accesses that would be inhibited by making
them "volatile"
Hi,
I want to convert a h-file of a c-library and h2pas has problems with it.
The file contains "static inline" functions.
A second problem is the "volatile" keyword that's used in the function.
How do I approach this ?
Google helped me understand the "volatile" keyword, but is there a
Pascal alte
20 matches
Mail list logo
