On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
On a side note,
1) for overloaded functions it seems
that only one result string is possible to define. As seen in the XML
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
On a side note,
1) for overloaded functions it seems
that only one result string is possible to define. As seen in the XML
file:(no desitinction based on result type)
Correct.
S
> In our previous episode, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl said:
>> > See also
>> > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14843
>> >
>> Could XML attributes be used to distinguish overloaded functions? eg
>>
>> boolean result
>> integer result
>>
>>
>> It should be relatively
In our previous episode, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl said:
> > See also
> > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14843
> >
> Could XML attributes be used to distinguish overloaded functions? eg
>
> boolean result
> integer result
>
>
> It should be relatively easy to im
> In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
>> >> On a side note,
>> >>
>> >> 1) for overloaded functions it seems
>> > that only one result string is possible to define. As seen in the XML
>> > file:(no desitinction based on result type)
>>
>> Correct.
>
> See also
> http://bugs.fr
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> >> On a side note,
> >>
> >> 1) for overloaded functions it seems
> > that only one result string is possible to define. As seen in the XML
> > file:(no desitinction based on result type)
>
> Correct.
See also
http://bugs.freepascal.org/
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
Resending the email. The images are here:
http://imagebin.org/192019 [3]
http://imagebin.org/192020 [4]
http://imagebin.org/192021 [5]
On 6 jan '12,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
I checked doxygen
(http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/do
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
When you have overloaded functions, fpdoc will group them on one page.
The arguments however are listed in two separate arguments sections. It
would be nice to have the arguments merged in one section. I do not know
how to display the arguments though (no idea what
Resending the email. The images are here:
http://imagebin.org/192019 [3]
http://imagebin.org/192020 [4]
http://imagebin.org/192021 [5]
On 6 jan '12,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> I checked doxygen
(http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/examples/overload/html/class_test.html#a8e7b46
Resending the email. The images are here:
http://imagebin.org/192019 [3]
http://imagebin.org/192020 [4]
http://imagebin.org/192021 [5]
On 6 jan '12,
dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
> I checked doxygen
(http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/examples/overload/html/class_test.html#a8e7b46
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl wrote:
When you have overloaded functions, fpdoc will group them on one
page. The arguments however are listed in two separate arguments
sections. It would be nice to have the arguments merged in one section.
I do not know how to display the argum
When you have overloaded functions, fpdoc will group them on one page. The arguments however are listed in two separate arguments sections. It would be nice to have the arguments merged in one section. I do not know how to display the arguments though (no idea what others do like pasdoc or doxyge
12 matches
Mail list logo
