On 01/10/13 11:07, Henry Vermaak wrote:
>
> With the obvious drawback that it doesn't respond to theme/accessibility
> changes.
Audio accessibility is possible. I just recently had a developer
implement that in his applications. He requested one or two small
changes to fpGUI to accomplish that.
a really good
project.
Nice work Graeme.
-Patrick
On 09/30/2013 03:33 PM, Fred van Stappen wrote:
Have you try fpGUI ?
https://github.com/graemeg/fpGUI/tree/develop
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:07:56 -0500
Subject:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:25:34AM +0100, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 29/09/13 23:33, Patrick wrote:
> > BTW, Would it be correct to compare LCL to WxWidgets ? In the sense that
> > it is a meta-widget toolkit?
>
> Yes, that would be an accurate comparison. LCL and WxWidgets are a
> "common fro
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 12:25 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> All functionality works identical on all platforms,
>>
> Which, regarding look and feel, does have pros and cons, depending on the
> users targeted.
>
Sometimes company branding in pr
On 09/30/2013 12:25 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
All functionality works identical on all platforms,
Which, regarding look and feel, does have pros and cons, depending on
the users targeted.
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
On 29/09/13 23:33, Patrick wrote:
> BTW, Would it be correct to compare LCL to WxWidgets ? In the sense that
> it is a meta-widget toolkit?
Yes, that would be an accurate comparison. LCL and WxWidgets are a
"common front-end toolkit" to other underlying GUI toolkits. This
obviously has its pros a
Have you try fpGUI ?
https://github.com/graemeg/fpGUI/tree/develop
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:07:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] GUI confusion
From: michal.wall...@gmail.com
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On Sep 29, 2013 8:24 AM, "Patrick" wrote:
> I don't really
I am new.
I use multiple monitors so, all of the panels could stay on one screen
and the form widget on another, docking might be handy to move all the
panels at once.
On 09/30/2013 09:57 AM, m...@rpzdesign.com wrote:
But how do you enable the anchor docking extension for Lazarus 1.0.12
Sven:
You ROCK!
md
On 9/30/2013 11:19 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 30.09.2013 15:57, schrieb m...@rpzdesign.com:
But how do you enable the anchor docking extension for Lazarus 1.0.12
and get some control of all the floating panels.
Install AnchorDockingDsgn package, rebuild Lazarus and now you're
HI,
You might like Geany.
http://www.geany.org/Main/About
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am 30.09.2013 15:57, schrieb m...@rpzdesign.com:
But how do you enable the anchor docking extension for Lazarus 1.0.12
and get some control of all the floating panels.
Install AnchorDockingDsgn package, rebuild Lazarus and now you're able
to dock.
Regards,
Sven
But how do you enable the anchor docking extension for Lazarus 1.0.12
and get some control of all the floating panels.
I personally would want all the panels to come to the front when I click
on any panel
instead of having to click a couple of times to bring console or
messages panel to the for
On 09/29/2013 03:24 PM, Patrick wrote:
Could anyone point me to resources on how to build GUI applications
without Lazarus?
If you mean the GUI library Lazarus offers there are alternatives that
have been pointed out.
If you mean Lazarus the IDE, you always can create a GUI using the
Lazarus
On Sep 29, 2013 8:24 AM, "Patrick" wrote:
> I don't really like IDEs. I used gvim and I suppose it could almost be
called an IDE as well but I mean I would rather use the shellr then
clicking on a build button.
For what its worth, I use free pascal practically every day, but rarely
open Lazarus.
There are alternatives, but first a distinction needs to me made. When
you say "Lazarus", do you mean simply the IDE, or do you mean the LCL
(Lazarus Component Library)?
>From your earlier remard about IDE's I assume you simply don't like IDE,
but you might not mind building LCL-based applicati
On 29/09/13 14:24, Patrick wrote:
> Could anyone point
> me to resources on how to build GUI applications without Lazarus?
There are alternatives, but first a distinction needs to me made. When
you say "Lazarus", do you mean simply the IDE, or do you mean the LCL
(Lazarus Component Library)?
>F
On 29.09.2013 20:54, Patrick wrote:
I actually tried to get started with FPC back In January. I felt that
the language was too tied to Lazarus and that I didn't want to use an
IDE so I gave up.
FPC is definitely independant of Lazarus, but Lazarus on the one hand
simplifies development signifi
Thanks again to Reinier and Sven
I just bought Getting Started with Lazarus IDE.
I actually tried to get started with FPC back In January. I felt that
the language was too tied to Lazarus and that I didn't want to use an
IDE so I gave up.
I will report back when I am a little further along t
On 29.09.2013 15:24, Patrick wrote:
Hi Everyone
I really like the pascal code I have looked at and I am very excited
about FPC. I hope this email won't upset anyone, it is a bit negative.
I don't really like IDEs. I used gvim and I suppose it could almost be
called an IDE as well but I mean I w
Hi Everyone
I really like the pascal code I have looked at and I am very excited
about FPC. I hope this email won't upset anyone, it is a bit negative.
I don't really like IDEs. I used gvim and I suppose it could almost be
called an IDE as well but I mean I would rather use the shellr then
c
20 matches
Mail list logo
