Hello Olle,
Thanks for your reply, it's not bad to have a gfx-related Linux
compatibility at the same time.
Monday, October 25, 2004, 11:14:53 PM, you wrote:
OR> In Lazarus it should in theory be possible to make an X Windows program
OR> which can be run in the X Windows enviroment in Mac OS X
04-10-23 16.22, skrev Peter Vreman följande:
> At 15:38 23-10-2004, you wrote:
>>
>> My goal is to be able to have the same program I have for Win32
>> compile and run for Mac just by switching compiler's target.
>
> See www.lazarus.freepascal.org for a the delphi-like RAD environment
In Lazaru
Hello Jonas,
Never mind, thanks!
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 11:51:02 PM, you wrote:
JM> On 24 okt 2004, at 18:25, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
>> But will it be possible to me to draw on a standard device context
>> returned to me by a host application? I.e. I do not need any standard
>> controls and
On 24 okt 2004, at 18:25, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
But will it be possible to me to draw on a standard device context
returned to me by a host application? I.e. I do not need any standard
controls and I would need to write my own controls for Lazarus.
I have no idea, sorry.
Jonas
_
Hello Jonas,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 12:23:22 AM, you wrote:
>> Thanks to Peter Vreman for Lazarus link. It looks like a helpful
>> thing. However I wonder about its Mac compatibility - not too much
>> Mac-related info is there it seems.
JM> It cannot yet generate programs which use the native
Aleksey Vaneev schrieb:
Hello Jonas,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
Hello,
have a look at:
http://instantware.bei.t-online.de/Xcode-FreePascal/
Y
On 23 okt 2004, at 22:06, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Thanks to Peter Vreman for Lazarus link. It looks like a helpful
thing. However I wonder about its Mac compatibility - not too much
Mac-related info is there it seems.
It cannot yet generate programs which use the native Mac OS X gui
(Aqua). It can g
Hello Jonas,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
>> The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
>> programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
JM> I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
JM> code, whether you us
On 23 okt 2004, at 15:38, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
code, whether you use much Windows-specific function
At 15:38 23-10-2004, you wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice m
Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice me to completely switch from De
11 matches
Mail list logo
