Re: [fpc-pascal] For-in support in the next FPC release

2010-06-02 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2 June 2010 15:08, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > Most features only get extensive real-world usage once they appear in a > released version. Fair enough. -- Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.fr

Re: [fpc-pascal] For-in support in the next FPC release

2010-06-02 Thread Paul Ishenin
02.06.2010 20:57, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Just because it's in Trunk or Fixes branch, doesn't mean it's actually used and thus tested. From this message thread, not many even knew it was implemented. Hence my concern about it moving so quickly into Fixes branch. It will be used by Lazarus o

Re: [fpc-pascal] For-in support in the next FPC release

2010-06-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 02 Jun 2010, at 14:57, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Op 2010-06-02 14:48, Jonas Maebe het geskryf: Yes (at least other people reported bugs about it on fpc-devel). If I remember correctly, those discussions were only while it was implemented. No real-world usage afterwards. Most features on

Re: [fpc-pascal] For-in support in the next FPC release

2010-06-02 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Op 2010-06-02 14:48, Jonas Maebe het geskryf: > > Yes (at least other people reported bugs about it on fpc-devel). If I remember correctly, those discussions were only while it was implemented. No real-world usage afterwards. > There was a discussion about it on core. It was merged because > a)

[fpc-pascal] For-in support in the next FPC release (was: PChar & AnsiString)

2010-06-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 02 Jun 2010, at 14:30, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 2 June 2010 14:16, Marco van de Voort wrote: Afaik it is merged into 2.4.1 already. Did somebody actually test it other than Paul (that also implemented it)? Yes (at least other people reported bugs about it on fpc-devel). If so, tha