On Mon, July 7, 2008 12:11, leledumbo wrote:
>
> So, what's the purpose of having them?
That's the part I could not answer myself and asked others who could
remember the reasons for introducing it. There may have been technical
reasons like support for "absolute" keyword (which could support a rea
So, what's the purpose of having them?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Flush%28StdOut%29-doesn%27t-mean-Flush%28Output%29-tp18311722p18313575.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fpc-p
On Mon, July 7, 2008 09:55, leledumbo wrote:
>
> In the rtl documentation, StdOut is defined as an alias for Output.
> Therefore, (I think) flushing one will also flush the other. But the
> truth,
> it's not. In fact, only Flush(Output) will really flush standard output.
> So,
> what will Flush(Std
In the rtl documentation, StdOut is defined as an alias for Output.
Therefore, (I think) flushing one will also flush the other. But the truth,
it's not. In fact, only Flush(Output) will really flush standard output. So,
what will Flush(StdOut) do?
PS: This might apply to StdErr (and StdIn, but I
