On 18 May 09, at 22:10, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 18 May 2009, at 21:03, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > I checked the windows code, and FindClose explicitly checks that
> > the searchrec record contains a valid handle (i.e. NOT
> > INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE), so all platforms would behave the same.
> >
On 18 May 2009, at 21:03, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I checked the windows code, and FindClose explicitly checks that
the searchrec record contains a valid handle (i.e. NOT
INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE), so all platforms would behave the same.
Opinions ? If no-one objects, I'll implement the 'fix', it
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > Opinions ? If no-one objects, I'll implement the 'fix', it's only
> > 2 lines of code.
>
> No fundamental objections, but maybe wait till just before a release to
> avoid packages that work w
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> Opinions ? If no-one objects, I'll implement the 'fix', it's only
> 2 lines of code.
No fundamental objections, but maybe wait till just before a release to
avoid packages that work with both 2.2.4 and 2.3.1 having to ifdef till the next
release
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
> This sounds good, just also check what happens if FindClose receives an
> invalid handle.
That was the second line in my line count estimate ;-)
Michael.___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
This sounds good, just also check what happens if FindClose receives an invalid
handle.
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> From: Michael Van Canneyt
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] FindFirst...FindClose
> To: "FP
On 18 May 2009, at 18:15, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
As far as I know, the FindClose is only needed when FindFirst
returned zero.
That has never been true on FPC/unix, as far as I can see.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
Yes.
Huh ? Since when is this requirement ?
Since as long as I can remember. It at least predates the switch to
svn (revision 1 of both rtl/unix/dos.pp and of rtl/unix/sysutils.pp
requires it).
Th
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said:
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > Huh ? Since when is this requirement ?
>
> Since as long as I can remember. It at least predates the switch to
> svn (revision 1 of both rtl/unix/dos.pp and of rtl/unix/sysutils.pp
> requires it).
The current situation is proba
Is that correct:
http://www.delphifaq.com/faq/delphi/windows_file_system/f419.shtml
?
If yes, then you need IFDEFs to distinguish between Linux and Windows. ;-(
Jürgen Hestermann
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
I must agree with Michael.
In my experience, it doesn't matter where the findclose() is placed, as long
as it's called within the scope of the findfirst(), findnext(). If
findclose() is not called, all that happens is that the OS will use up file
handles, which are finite in quantity on any giv
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 18 May 2009, at 17:25, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 18 May 2009, at 16:39, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
By reading the FPC.RTL documentation, I found it says that FindClose must
be
used outside the if, as fo
On 18 May 2009, at 17:25, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 18 May 2009, at 16:39, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
By reading the FPC.RTL documentation, I found it says that
FindClose must be
used outside the if, as follows:
if FindFirst(Edit1.Text, FileAttrs,
09, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> From: Michael Van Canneyt
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] FindFirst...FindClose
> To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 12:25 PM
>
>
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> >
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 18 May 2009, at 16:39, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
> >Apparently my program gets stuck after a couple (several, in fact) of calls
> >to the function that includes this code.
> >
> >By reading the FPC.RTL documentation, I found it says that FindClose
On 18 May 2009, at 16:39, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Apparently my program gets stuck after a couple (several, in fact)
of calls to the function that includes this code.
By reading the FPC.RTL documentation, I found it says that FindClose
must be used outside the if, as follows:
if FindFirs
Hi, I ported a Delphi service to linux using FPC. The app uses FindFirst,
FindNext and FindClose the same way Delphi Help shows:
if FindFirst(Edit1.Text, FileAttrs, sr) = 0 then
begin
repeat
...
...
until FindNext(sr) <> 0;
FindClose(sr);
end;
Apparently my program gets stuck afte
17 matches
Mail list logo
