On 27 Jan 2009, at 10:22, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 27 Jan 2009, at 10:07, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
TSQLQuery and friends use the dynamically loaded version, for good
reason:
they must be usable in circumstances where you don't know if the
li
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 27 Jan 2009, at 10:07, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >On 27 Jan 2009, at 08:36, Bee wrote:
> > >
> > > > >2) Is there other advice the forum can offer (eg. does Classic remain a
> > > > >reas
On 27 Jan 2009, at 10:07, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 27 Jan 2009, at 08:36, Bee wrote:
2) Is there other advice the forum can offer (eg. does Classic
remain a
reasonable choice, is SuperServer support planned, etc).
I simply made a symlink nam
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 27 Jan 2009, at 08:36, Bee wrote:
>
> > >2) Is there other advice the forum can offer (eg. does Classic remain a
> > >reasonable choice, is SuperServer support planned, etc).
> >
> >I simply made a symlink name libfbclient.so in folder /usr/lib wh
On 27 Jan 2009, at 08:36, Bee wrote:
2) Is there other advice the forum can offer (eg. does Classic
remain a reasonable choice, is SuperServer support planned, etc).
I simply made a symlink name libfbclient.so in folder /usr/lib which
point to /Library/Frameworks/Firebird.framework/Version
We have been using Mac OS X 10.5 XCode 311, Firebird 211 Classic 32 bit
with FPC 224 (which contains the fix for the framework .dylib extension
so that libfbclient.dylib can be located). This works with FPC,
FlameRobin and RazorSQL. However, reading Firebird's recommendation
that unless there
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
> >
> > As far as the 'recommendation' is concerned: for systems with multiple
> > CPUs it is better to use Classic server, as Superserver can use only
> > 1 processor.
>
> "... multi
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Andrew Hall wrote:
> 1) Can FPC work with Firebird SuperServer - if so, what configuration
> changes are required or does the FPC library required modification?
We use Firebird SuperServer on our Linux and Windows systems. No
modifications were required.
Regar
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
> As far as the 'recommendation' is concerned: for systems with multiple
> CPUs it is better to use Classic server, as Superserver can use only
> 1 processor.
"... multiple CPUs" - Does that include the new multi-core CPU's?
> The u
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Andrew Hall wrote:
> We have been using Mac OS X 10.5 XCode 311, Firebird 211 Classic 32 bit with
> FPC 224 (which contains the fix for the framework .dylib extension so that
> libfbclient.dylib can be located). This works with FPC, FlameRobin and
> RazorSQL. However, read
We have been using Mac OS X 10.5 XCode 311, Firebird 211 Classic 32
bit with FPC 224 (which contains the fix for the framework .dylib
extension so that libfbclient.dylib can be located). This works with
FPC, FlameRobin and RazorSQL. However, reading Firebird's
recommendation that unless t
11 matches
Mail list logo
