Jonas Maebe wrote:
Just a brief note to say that using the distributed 2.0.0 binaries I
was able to compile and install 2.0.4. Normal minor problems with a
couple symlinks and fpc.cfg, but nothing's obviously broken since I
was playing with it last Summer.
2.0.4 or 2.1.4?
2.0.4 for the mom
On 01 Jul 2007, at 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Just a brief note to say that using the distributed 2.0.0 binaries
I was able to compile and install 2.0.4. Normal minor problems with
a couple symlinks and fpc.cfg, but nothing's obviously broken since
I was playing with it last Summer.
Just a brief note to say that using the distributed 2.0.0 binaries I was able
to compile and install 2.0.4. Normal minor problems with a couple symlinks and
fpc.cfg, but nothing's obviously broken since I was playing with it last Summer.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
Tomas Hajny wrote:
> In any case, you might try compilation of sources exported from SVN tag
> release_2_0_4_rc2 - starting with "make compiler_cycle" in fpcsrc
> directory and then possibly continuing with release-like build. I guess
> that this could be done using the makepack script, but I'm no
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
It should be in a good shape, what's needed is a maintainer who's
building releases, handling/testing bug reports etc. Simply the annoying
work nobody wants to do :)
OK, so if I were to get the last binary release (2.0.0?) I should be able to
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> It should be in a good shape, what's needed is a maintainer who's
> building releases, handling/testing bug reports etc. Simply the annoying
> work nobody wants to do :)
OK, so if I were to get the last binary release (2.0.0?) I should be able to
bootstrap to 2.0.2. I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> What needs to be done to revitalise FPC on SPARC? Without wanting to commit
> myself since I've already got more work than I can cope with is it something
> that somebody who is neither a core FPC developer nor a RISC guru can help
> with?
>
It should be in a good shap
What needs to be done to revitalise FPC on SPARC? Without wanting to commit
myself since I've already got more work than I can cope with is it something
that somebody who is neither a core FPC developer nor a RISC guru can help with?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opini
> I'd like to use FPC 1.9.6 on Solaris 9 on Sparc. Is there a build I can
> start with for compiling the compiler? If not, do you recommend a platform
> for crosscompiling?
There is no Solaris support in 1.9.6. Also not for i386. The solaris RTL
needs to be rewritten using the new FPC_USE_LIBC and
Hello,
I'd like to use FPC 1.9.6 on Solaris 9 on Sparc. Is there a build I can
start with for compiling the compiler? If not, do you recommend a platform
for crosscompiling?
Thanks,
Fabian.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
h
10 matches
Mail list logo
