___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 4/25/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The quoted code above adds "-FE." to the compiler command line. For
> some reason this doesn't seem to work in your Makefile, which results
> in the compiled units being put in the directory where their source
> is located. Consequently, they
On 25 apr 2006, at 11:21, Adrian Maier wrote:
Please try
make clean all OPT="-vtu"
That should make it clear why it doesn't want to use the new unixtype
(or why it wants to recompile it).
It is searching for UNIXTYPE only in rtl/inc , while in fact unixtype
is in rtl/unix :
http://www.new
On 4/25/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 25 apr 2006, at 10:17, Adrian Maier wrote:
>
> >> That is not good. Can you post the output of a "make clean all"?
> >> (without this -Fu/data/fpc/2.0.0/release_2_0_0/rtl/unix added to your
> >> config file)
> >
> > Sure:
> > http://www.news
On 25 apr 2006, at 10:17, Adrian Maier wrote:
That is not good. Can you post the output of a "make clean all"?
(without this -Fu/data/fpc/2.0.0/release_2_0_0/rtl/unix added to your
config file)
Sure:
http://www.newsoftcontrol.ro/~am/gmake_clean_all.txt
Please try
make clean all OPT="-vtu"
On 4/25/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ gmake --version
> > GNU Make 3.80
> >
> > One more thing:when compiling rtl/inc/ctypes.pp , it was unable to
> > find the unit UNIXTYPE. And i had to add to fpc.conf:
> > -Fu/data/fpc/2.0.0/release_2_0_0/rtl/unix
> > So, it seems to me t
On 23 apr 2006, at 19:44, Adrian Maier wrote:
Yes. the compiler is 1.0.10
Does "make info" also show this?
Yes, it does. I've included the full output of 'gmake info' at the
end of the email.
Why do you suspect that the compiler version is not well detected?
(the only compiler i have is 1.
On 4/23/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2006, at 21:23, Adrian Maier wrote:
>
> > Yes. the compiler is 1.0.10
>
> Does "make info" also show this?
Yes, it does. I've included the full output of 'gmake info' at the
end of the email.
Why do you suspect that the compiler versi
On 4/22/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since lists.freepascal.org is down currently...
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So normally it should try to compile sysbsd.pp and not system.pp
> > (rtl/bsd/sysbsd.pp simply includes the contents of
On 22 Apr 2006, at 21:23, Adrian Maier wrote:
So normally it should try to compile sysbsd.pp and not system.pp
(rtl/bsd/sysbsd.pp simply includes the contents of rtl/bsd/
system.pp, but a unit file called "system.pp" cannot have the unit
name "sysbsd"). Is your /usr/local/bin/ppc386 a version 1
On 19 Apr 2006, at 21:25, Adrian Maier wrote:
Ok. I'll try to get 2.0.0 working, but i'll certainly need some
guidance at
the beginning.
Of course.
I downloaded the release_2_0_0 from svn , and i am now trying to
compile rtl using the fpc 1.0.10 .
1. cd rtl/netbsd
2. gmake
[...]
/usr/l
( i'm re-posting. My answer got rejected bacause gmail's smtp is blacklisted
as spam *again* . very annoying )
On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much
> you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 ru
On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much
> you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 running as
> wel. The downside is that you have to download the 2.0 sources. The
> upside is that you don't have to m
> NetBSD is not on fpc's list of supported operating systems, although there
> is an older version available (1.0.10) which works fine, at least for my
> purposes.
Currently there is none. 1.9.2 had NetBSD/macppc support for a while, but it
wasn't maintained.
> I've tried to compile the latest
On 18 apr 2006, at 22:53, Adrian Maier wrote:
NetBSD is not on fpc's list of supported operating systems,
although there
is an older version available (1.0.10) which works fine, at least
for my
purposes.
I've tried to compile the latest sources (svn), but :
system.pp(23,6) Error: Illegal
Hello ,
NetBSD is not on fpc's list of supported operating systems, although there
is an older version available (1.0.10) which works fine, at least for my
purposes.
I've tried to compile the latest sources (svn), but :
system.pp(23,6) Error: Illegal unit name: SYSTEM
systemh.inc(26,4) Fatal: U
16 matches
Mail list logo
